Jeff ... a take on the events you may appreciate. A lengthy quote revealing the crux of the post, a well informed building of the summation precedes it on the substack post.
Jeff ... a take on the events you may appreciate. A lengthy quote revealing the crux of the post, a well informed building of the summation precedes it on the substack post.
So, here’s a theory which could line up with current events…
The timing of the event is suspicious. If the assassination had been successful, the Republicans would have had to choose another candidate at the Republican National Convention, happening about now. Given that it took place after the crucial debates which sealed Bidens fate, this makes me wonder if it was a coup attempt by a Republican conspiracy.
Consider that only two other candidates on ‘his side’ have delegates: Ron DeSantis, and Nikki Haley. While Haley is a neocon and DeSantis is undecided, both align in the three crucial sectors; they support the Israel lobby, they support the intelligence agencies current leadership, and they back wars in the Middle East and Europe. Trump does not.
Note also that some time ago, Vivek Ramaswamy went on record saying that the only reason Nikki Haley had not dropped out - despite having zero populist support - was because her donors were “plotting to eliminate Trump from the ballet”.
To address the three major institutions - the intelligence agencies, Israel lobby, and military contractors - one must look at Trumps rhetoric. This explains why his own party would be motivated to take him out. I will draw comparisons with the most obvious individual - JFK.
The first issue is the Israel lobby. Thus far Trump’s biggest donors have been Zionists and Silicon Valley technocrats. The Zionists - most notably the mega wealthy Miriam Adelson - do not appear to be supporting Trump. There is strong incentive for a conservative leadership to provide military aid to Israel. Why? Firstly, Netanyahu needs war to stay in office, and when he eventually steps down (which will happen once the conflict ends) he would likely be indicted on various corruption charges and probably end up in prison. Secondly - or rather on a deeper level - Netanyahu could be seen as a pawn. Those holding power - like his finance minister and others unnamed - also desire war; under the justification of ‘national security’ they seek to destroy Israel’s regional rivals (Lebanon, Iran) and expand their borders to create ‘Greater Israel’.
Thus, it came as a surprise to many that Trump - despite receiving over $100 million from Zionist donors - never bowed down in worship towards Israel. Both DeSantis and Haley have, in fact they speak of Israel as they would speak of God. What’s more, Trump also went on record not too long ago, claiming that Netanyahu received ‘justified criticism’ for the 7/10 attack last year. This suggests that Trump has not yet yielded to his donors completely. This makes him a threat to Israel lobby, as he may be unwilling to finance another major middle eastern war. For the Zionist leadership, maybe is not a good enough guarantee when it comes to military aid; without America Israel’s military grinds to a halt.
Likewise, Kennedy angered these groups, since he advocated for three things; Palestinian right-of-return to Israel, a shut down on the Israeli nuclear weapons program, and the registration of AIPAC as a foreign agent (through FARA). In my view it seems that this was the final straw which landed him in a coffin.
The second major player is the intelligence community, or more specifically the Silicon Valley technocrats who have evidently taken over the security apparatus. Key figures here (who are relevant to the Trump administration) are Peter Thiel (who rose to prominence thanks to funding from neocon Irving Kristol), and his proteges JD Vance, Curtis Yarvin, and so forth. This movement seeks to - as Thiel once put it - create a ‘techno monarchy’ in America. Many within the right-leaning Silicon Valley scene appear to be neoconservatives, who advocate for mass surveillance, invasive technologies, and so forth. Thiel even said that the CIA is a front for Palantir - his infamous digital security firm. And, they appear to have no issue with the Israel lobby or the military industrial complex.
Likewise, Kennedy promised to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces, reigning in their black projects which were becoming increasingly detached from any sense of national security. They too went after him because of this.
Which brings me to the last important group of players, the military contractors. These are arguably the most financially powerful, although not the most influential on this list. It seems obvious that out of all the republican candidates, Trump is the only (perhaps save Vivek, who was quickly removed) to stand against expanded geopolitical hostility. DeSantis yields to his donors, whilst Haley literally worked as a defence contractor, and now desires to send American troops to Israel and Ukraine. Trump - in contrast - has made it obvious that peace in the Middle East is of top priority. He has also suggested that the Ukraine war will be ended before he is even officially inaugurated. Putin has said he is onboard with this. The outcome will be obvious; Ukraine will be integrated with Russia in some way, essentially becoming a rump state. Everyone in the neocon sphere fumes at the thought of this; NATO, the RNC, and of course the contractors. Note that the contractors are not only sending existing surplus weapons to Ukraine (as we are often told), but they are also actively replenishing supplies. They aren’t doing this for free, and what they charge is beyond insane.
Likewise, Kennedy sought to end the Cold War. After the failed Great Leap Forward he wanted to normalise relations with China, whilst a thawing Soviet Union meant that peace with the Russians was very possible. This all came crashing down with his assassination. It wasn’t just him who tried this; his brother sought peace, and he also paid with his life. Later, Nixon and Kissinger would also try for peace with China and Russia, only to be conveniently tied up in corruption claims and removed from office, with all their progress reverted by the neocons in the Ford administration.
Thus, with all this in mind, one can see why his ‘own’ people would be willing to sacrifice him. They would benefit financially, socially, and politically through incentives. If Trump had been successfully taken out, then realistically the events which followed would have looked something like this; liberals receive the blowback for the event, Haley or DeSantis are selected to lead, the people rally behind them as they use dialectical rhetoric to stoke anger towards the left while obfuscating from the right, they enter office and proceed to operate as agents of all three major institutions mentioned, and for the next four years ride off of the anger produced during the Trump shooting.
If everything had gone to plan, they would have a Haley or DeSantis presidency, and this cabinet would allow all three interest groups to benefit at the expense of the American people’s tax dollars, or with their lives. It would arguably be worse than another Biden presidency, since I doubt DeSantis or Haley would even bother addressing what would have been the one potential upside - the deportation of illegals and the shutting of the border.
For this reason, with the information currently available, I believe that the Trump shooting could have been an attempted coup. The liberal establishment are still adversaries of the people, but in this case, I think the shots were fired by his own party in a bid to change the direction of the presidency. For the moment at least, it failed, thank God.
These major interest groups are what sway the White House. This is why the Trump administration needs proper staff; true loyalists who stand by America, not by contractors, foreign agencies, and money. This is what Project 2025 is all about, and it is why such a project needs to be adopted by Trump. By what appears to be divine intervention, he lives to see another day and this should be his cue to truly go all-in during this coming presidency; end foreign interference, end bribery from contractors and corporations, and truly attempt to fix America.
Holy.................! Thank you for posting this!
"The timing of the event is suspicious..." Having read this, I marvel at how obvious it is and I missed it entirely. It makes perfect sense and fits the anomalies pointing to an inside job better than any other scenario and it fits like a glove with history.
Had Trump been killed, "It would arguably be worse than another Biden presidency..."
You're welcome - I felt and thought the same as you. It fits like a glove. Thoughts on this view not being spoken of anywhere but by the originator of the post?
Jeff ... a take on the events you may appreciate. A lengthy quote revealing the crux of the post, a well informed building of the summation precedes it on the substack post.
Escaping Mass Psychosis
https://escapingmasspsychosis.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-the-assassination-attempt?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=484620&post_id=146626528&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=12vcal&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
GUESTS
Thoughts on the Assassination Attempt
Letters from O'Brien #59
WINSTON SMITH
JUL 15, 2024
Most significant portion of the post:
So, here’s a theory which could line up with current events…
The timing of the event is suspicious. If the assassination had been successful, the Republicans would have had to choose another candidate at the Republican National Convention, happening about now. Given that it took place after the crucial debates which sealed Bidens fate, this makes me wonder if it was a coup attempt by a Republican conspiracy.
Consider that only two other candidates on ‘his side’ have delegates: Ron DeSantis, and Nikki Haley. While Haley is a neocon and DeSantis is undecided, both align in the three crucial sectors; they support the Israel lobby, they support the intelligence agencies current leadership, and they back wars in the Middle East and Europe. Trump does not.
Note also that some time ago, Vivek Ramaswamy went on record saying that the only reason Nikki Haley had not dropped out - despite having zero populist support - was because her donors were “plotting to eliminate Trump from the ballet”.
To address the three major institutions - the intelligence agencies, Israel lobby, and military contractors - one must look at Trumps rhetoric. This explains why his own party would be motivated to take him out. I will draw comparisons with the most obvious individual - JFK.
The first issue is the Israel lobby. Thus far Trump’s biggest donors have been Zionists and Silicon Valley technocrats. The Zionists - most notably the mega wealthy Miriam Adelson - do not appear to be supporting Trump. There is strong incentive for a conservative leadership to provide military aid to Israel. Why? Firstly, Netanyahu needs war to stay in office, and when he eventually steps down (which will happen once the conflict ends) he would likely be indicted on various corruption charges and probably end up in prison. Secondly - or rather on a deeper level - Netanyahu could be seen as a pawn. Those holding power - like his finance minister and others unnamed - also desire war; under the justification of ‘national security’ they seek to destroy Israel’s regional rivals (Lebanon, Iran) and expand their borders to create ‘Greater Israel’.
Thus, it came as a surprise to many that Trump - despite receiving over $100 million from Zionist donors - never bowed down in worship towards Israel. Both DeSantis and Haley have, in fact they speak of Israel as they would speak of God. What’s more, Trump also went on record not too long ago, claiming that Netanyahu received ‘justified criticism’ for the 7/10 attack last year. This suggests that Trump has not yet yielded to his donors completely. This makes him a threat to Israel lobby, as he may be unwilling to finance another major middle eastern war. For the Zionist leadership, maybe is not a good enough guarantee when it comes to military aid; without America Israel’s military grinds to a halt.
Likewise, Kennedy angered these groups, since he advocated for three things; Palestinian right-of-return to Israel, a shut down on the Israeli nuclear weapons program, and the registration of AIPAC as a foreign agent (through FARA). In my view it seems that this was the final straw which landed him in a coffin.
The second major player is the intelligence community, or more specifically the Silicon Valley technocrats who have evidently taken over the security apparatus. Key figures here (who are relevant to the Trump administration) are Peter Thiel (who rose to prominence thanks to funding from neocon Irving Kristol), and his proteges JD Vance, Curtis Yarvin, and so forth. This movement seeks to - as Thiel once put it - create a ‘techno monarchy’ in America. Many within the right-leaning Silicon Valley scene appear to be neoconservatives, who advocate for mass surveillance, invasive technologies, and so forth. Thiel even said that the CIA is a front for Palantir - his infamous digital security firm. And, they appear to have no issue with the Israel lobby or the military industrial complex.
Likewise, Kennedy promised to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces, reigning in their black projects which were becoming increasingly detached from any sense of national security. They too went after him because of this.
Which brings me to the last important group of players, the military contractors. These are arguably the most financially powerful, although not the most influential on this list. It seems obvious that out of all the republican candidates, Trump is the only (perhaps save Vivek, who was quickly removed) to stand against expanded geopolitical hostility. DeSantis yields to his donors, whilst Haley literally worked as a defence contractor, and now desires to send American troops to Israel and Ukraine. Trump - in contrast - has made it obvious that peace in the Middle East is of top priority. He has also suggested that the Ukraine war will be ended before he is even officially inaugurated. Putin has said he is onboard with this. The outcome will be obvious; Ukraine will be integrated with Russia in some way, essentially becoming a rump state. Everyone in the neocon sphere fumes at the thought of this; NATO, the RNC, and of course the contractors. Note that the contractors are not only sending existing surplus weapons to Ukraine (as we are often told), but they are also actively replenishing supplies. They aren’t doing this for free, and what they charge is beyond insane.
Likewise, Kennedy sought to end the Cold War. After the failed Great Leap Forward he wanted to normalise relations with China, whilst a thawing Soviet Union meant that peace with the Russians was very possible. This all came crashing down with his assassination. It wasn’t just him who tried this; his brother sought peace, and he also paid with his life. Later, Nixon and Kissinger would also try for peace with China and Russia, only to be conveniently tied up in corruption claims and removed from office, with all their progress reverted by the neocons in the Ford administration.
Thus, with all this in mind, one can see why his ‘own’ people would be willing to sacrifice him. They would benefit financially, socially, and politically through incentives. If Trump had been successfully taken out, then realistically the events which followed would have looked something like this; liberals receive the blowback for the event, Haley or DeSantis are selected to lead, the people rally behind them as they use dialectical rhetoric to stoke anger towards the left while obfuscating from the right, they enter office and proceed to operate as agents of all three major institutions mentioned, and for the next four years ride off of the anger produced during the Trump shooting.
If everything had gone to plan, they would have a Haley or DeSantis presidency, and this cabinet would allow all three interest groups to benefit at the expense of the American people’s tax dollars, or with their lives. It would arguably be worse than another Biden presidency, since I doubt DeSantis or Haley would even bother addressing what would have been the one potential upside - the deportation of illegals and the shutting of the border.
For this reason, with the information currently available, I believe that the Trump shooting could have been an attempted coup. The liberal establishment are still adversaries of the people, but in this case, I think the shots were fired by his own party in a bid to change the direction of the presidency. For the moment at least, it failed, thank God.
These major interest groups are what sway the White House. This is why the Trump administration needs proper staff; true loyalists who stand by America, not by contractors, foreign agencies, and money. This is what Project 2025 is all about, and it is why such a project needs to be adopted by Trump. By what appears to be divine intervention, he lives to see another day and this should be his cue to truly go all-in during this coming presidency; end foreign interference, end bribery from contractors and corporations, and truly attempt to fix America.
Sincerely yours,
O’Brien
Holy.................! Thank you for posting this!
"The timing of the event is suspicious..." Having read this, I marvel at how obvious it is and I missed it entirely. It makes perfect sense and fits the anomalies pointing to an inside job better than any other scenario and it fits like a glove with history.
Had Trump been killed, "It would arguably be worse than another Biden presidency..."
Everyone should read this.
You're welcome - I felt and thought the same as you. It fits like a glove. Thoughts on this view not being spoken of anywhere but by the originator of the post?
And that's a truth tell.