In a stunning departure from regulatory norms, EPA has greenlit Ledprona for three years of commercial use—before the standard testing period is even complete. Your voice is needed.
People need to turn off their idiot Dancing with the Half Naked Stars, Keeping up with the Kartrashians, and the latest Chicago Bears vs. the Roman Coliseum Gladiators panem et circenses and get a clue. Your life might depend on it. In fact, it DOES.
i just went to the comment section- there were 12 comments, all except one, in support of the pesticide. i also couldn't see how to leave a comment. i could read them, sort them, etc. i've left comments before but couldn't figure this one out.
this is one of those things that they'll approve and then 10 or so years from now, will say Oops, we didn't think of that. happens every time
Do you have info. on who developed this and if gov. employees will receive royalties from this product or future products in the pipeline? Who owns the patents? Thanks
Search for the appropriate docket ID number or EPA docket number. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0271-0009)
Click the "Comment Now" button or follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Submit your comments.
Please note that once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the EPA's public docket. Unfortunately, I no longer see the "Comment Now" button. So, we have to email them. Please call the EPA and tell them to re-instate public comments for docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0271-0009 (734)-214-4300
Made my comment in no uncertain terms.. graciously I hope .. to release Ledprova would be grossly irresponsible without a peer reviewed double blind study on plant and animal[ minimum of 100 plant and animal test subjects] for at least one year.. to release this Frankenstein formulation without a study could prove to be criminal
This falls into the idea of regulatory processes in agriculture/farming, medical diagnostics and medical technology and manufacturing. The ideas for this type of agreement is troubling for me. Different countries are given the opportunity to work collectively on new ideas in technology with fewer concerns. It looks like the regulatory process will have more responsibility given to industry and not government. The document focuses on advanced technology and the ushering in of the fourth industrial revolution.
How can a chemical be approved for use on produce grown for human consumption when the safety testing hasn't been completed - looks like they're trying to rush this crap through before anyone finds out how toxic & deadly it is, not just to whoever is unlucky enough to eat this frankenfood but to the surrounding environment - sound familiar??
When I was little we would sometimes find a Caterpillar or a little bug on the veg or lettuce when preparing to cook or eat it & my mother always said, 'see it's good to eat because the creatures are on it so it hasn't been sprayed to death with chemicals'.
Whilst I understand that farmers need to reduce loss of harvest to bugs etc, you cannot eliminate nature completely & when you take from nature you owe a little back - it's only fair.
Better to find out what likes to eat those Beetles than smother everything in RNA
Wow. One like. There should be a million.
People need to turn off their idiot Dancing with the Half Naked Stars, Keeping up with the Kartrashians, and the latest Chicago Bears vs. the Roman Coliseum Gladiators panem et circenses and get a clue. Your life might depend on it. In fact, it DOES.
i just went to the comment section- there were 12 comments, all except one, in support of the pesticide. i also couldn't see how to leave a comment. i could read them, sort them, etc. i've left comments before but couldn't figure this one out.
this is one of those things that they'll approve and then 10 or so years from now, will say Oops, we didn't think of that. happens every time
Do you have info. on who developed this and if gov. employees will receive royalties from this product or future products in the pipeline? Who owns the patents? Thanks
This is horrifying!
To submit comments to the EPA, you can follow these steps:
Visit https://www.regulations.gov
Search for the appropriate docket ID number or EPA docket number. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0271-0009)
Click the "Comment Now" button or follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Submit your comments.
Please note that once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the EPA's public docket. Unfortunately, I no longer see the "Comment Now" button. So, we have to email them. Please call the EPA and tell them to re-instate public comments for docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0271-0009 (734)-214-4300
What is the corporation that is developing this pesticide? We need to pressure that corporation directly.
Done 😊 If I can figure it out, anyone can.
Made my comment in no uncertain terms.. graciously I hope .. to release Ledprova would be grossly irresponsible without a peer reviewed double blind study on plant and animal[ minimum of 100 plant and animal test subjects] for at least one year.. to release this Frankenstein formulation without a study could prove to be criminal
Thank you. Great Work. Commenting Now. Learn to GROW as much of your own FOOD, or buy and support local farms, as much as you can.
I do not seem to be able to leave a comment against fast tracking of Ledprona...
later:
Using the sequence above in comments I was able to leave a comment against the fast tracking of Ledprona, and why.
Wanna get their attention , tell Greta and AOC it causes the planet to heat up exponentially… 🤨
Comment submitted at the link you provided https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0271-0003
https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/agile-governance-for-the-post-pandemic-world-wef-oecd-joint-event.htm
This falls into the idea of regulatory processes in agriculture/farming, medical diagnostics and medical technology and manufacturing. The ideas for this type of agreement is troubling for me. Different countries are given the opportunity to work collectively on new ideas in technology with fewer concerns. It looks like the regulatory process will have more responsibility given to industry and not government. The document focuses on advanced technology and the ushering in of the fourth industrial revolution.
I can already see huge problems with safety.
I did the first time this was posted.
Submitted comment per Dr. Jack's prior post with link : )
This sounds really illegal
How can a chemical be approved for use on produce grown for human consumption when the safety testing hasn't been completed - looks like they're trying to rush this crap through before anyone finds out how toxic & deadly it is, not just to whoever is unlucky enough to eat this frankenfood but to the surrounding environment - sound familiar??
When I was little we would sometimes find a Caterpillar or a little bug on the veg or lettuce when preparing to cook or eat it & my mother always said, 'see it's good to eat because the creatures are on it so it hasn't been sprayed to death with chemicals'.
Whilst I understand that farmers need to reduce loss of harvest to bugs etc, you cannot eliminate nature completely & when you take from nature you owe a little back - it's only fair.
Better to find out what likes to eat those Beetles than smother everything in RNA
Everyday theres more horrible news 😪