This article specifically refers to the HART article written in June 2023, endorsed very recently by Andrew Bridgen and I specifically address the statements therein.
SARS-CoV-2 is UNIQUELY novel in that it has inserts not found in any other circulating coronavirus. The reason, we now know for sure, is that SC-2 was created in a lab, with those specific and very unique inserts. In the article I reference, cited by Bridgen, HART deny that the SC-2 virus is novel and they failed to acknowledge then that the virus was man-made, so it would be encumbent upon HART to now amend their previous position in line with the evidence, especially as Andrew Bridgen is publicly endorsing their article written in June last year.
The January 2024 article specifically references the "null hypothesis" article which makes the novelty distinction that I quoted above.
HART wrote about (and endorsed) the 'lab leak' theory over two years ago, as referenced above. SC-2 therefore being 'novel' is true... the point being made is that all variants are 'novel', and so 'novelty is not novel'.
The danger of hyping SC-2 as being a 'novel lab leak' is that it gives the 'pandemic preparedness' crew exactly what they want: (1) a scared populace that demands (2) huge budgets for 'biosecurity' and more pharmaceutical countermeasures.
I think everyone would agree with you that those who created the chimera (that HART wrote about in 2021 in an article that has been repeatedly referenced) should face the full force of the law.
Saying "all variants are new", therefore novel is NOT novel." is, IMV, nonsense when discussing a man made GOF variant. I can find dozens of quotes about the flu like mildness of Covid. They are correct in the narrow perspective of CFR. Yet there are dozens of peer review reports about multiple complex long term issues with the spike, not associated with any flu, or sometimes very very infrequently, relative to Covid. The harms of the vaccine and the Covid virus, are long, complex, and nearly identical.
Minimising the crime of GOF research that produced Covid, is to invite it again. US and China policy is doing just that. China said "it is liike a cold." The US does less then 10 percent of the testing they formerly did. Policy is 180 degrees from when they hyped Covid. They are responsible for both the viral and vaccine harms, and need to be accountable for both.
But they've been doing this for twenty plus years. Do you think SARS-CoV-2 is the first and only GoF release? Far more reasonable to assume they are all GoF outputs.
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not minimising the GoF crimes, not am I minimising the jab crimes. Far from it! Defund / shut down the lot, I say.
But be nuanced and don't swallow the "official" lab leak story. They want you to think a point leak in late Nov 2019 ran away and infected the world, thus justifying their lockdowns, the masks and the jabs.
Truth is they've been running leaky establishments for years, and SARS-CoV-2 took years of swarming/varying/spreading until they were able shine the spotlight on it with a particular diagnostic test.
There is no 'official' lab leak story. They denied it and still do. 'They' emphasise that by far the greater risk of a deadly pandemic is a 'spillover' from an animal to human host, most likely because of an imaginary 'climate crisis'. They themselves have downplayed the risk of a lab leak of a GOF virus. The true origin of SC-2 has not been revealed because of any story-telling on the part of the establishment, it has been painstakingly uncovered by diligent researchers and scientists who have had to carefully piece together the evidence and thus identify the criminals responsible.
I wrote about the lab leak over two years ago. They didn't want to to think that then, because of you'd thought that then you (not you, you know what I mean: "average citizen who went along with lockdown") would have pushed back against authorities for allowing the nonsense, and you'd have been less likely to take the jab.
Now that you've taken the jab (not you or me, of course...) they want you to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing this tune.
The tune needs to be refined to say that ALL GoF must end AND THE CONTAGION FILM-STYLE FAIRYTALES ARE JUST THAT: FAIRYTALES.
By that same logic, nobody is going to get jabbed for the new Disease X lab leak virus then, especially as people have been dropping dead all over the world because of the Covid jabs.
Let me finish by discussing a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology back in 2010. The researchers conducted a large-scale comprehensive screening (using a sensitive PCR test) for all four coronaviruses by analysis of 11,661 diagnostic respiratory samples collected in Edinburgh over 3 years between July 2006 and June 2009. And what did they find? “Coronaviruses were detected in 0.3[%] to 0.85% of samples in all age groups. Generally, coronaviruses displayed marked winter seasonality between the months of December and April and were not detected in summer months, which is comparable to the pattern seen with influenza viruses… A total of 11[%] to 41% of coronaviruses detected were in samples testing positive for other respiratory viruses”.
Sound familiar? That is because it is. It happens every year in northern latitudes during autumn and winter. The years 2006 to 2009 were not pandemic – or epidemic – years, and neither is 2020 to 2021. Also the PCR test currently in use is not specific, and is known to pick up other coronaviruses. There is no overriding correlation – let alone causation – linking all the restrictions we are suffering to an amelioration of respiratory disease, which happens every year. There is also no sign whatsoever of exponential growth of cases, hospitalisations or mortality, or an excessive burden on health services due to ‘coronavirus’. It is the restrictions – bubbles, mandatory quarantines, distancing, closures – that are putting pressure on services, and as such are a problem of the government’s own making.
Alex, your assertion.. (correted to clairfy what I think you are aserting...
" Now that the population has taken the jab (not you, of course...) they want the people to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing tune."
I find illogical. If, as is accurate, GOF research was cause of a global pandemic, then it cannot logically lead to allowing more GOF research.
If those who skirted GOF laws are correctly held accountable, and the more severe the crime the more vigourous the pursuit of justice should be, then the punishment should be more severe, leading to greater deterence of repeat offense. As to preventing future tyranny in the name of pandemic response, pointing out that the very people responsible for the global pandemic, are likewise responsible for the response including the vaccines that was cause to even greater death, and vast economic harm to the world. (In short global tyranny one world government is a disaster in every way) Truth is always the best course.
I agree that we should point at the GoFers (and their henchmen) and bring them to book for wasting money, time and for decades of fiddled viruses that may or may not have been involved with people becoming ill. Viruses are just part of the furniture, some are dangerous, some not. Look at the 2010 coronavirus paper I referenced above.
But accuse those GoFers at the same time as ratcheting DOWN how risky these viruses are, whether zoonotic, entirely man-made, or a mixture, or a huge suite of slightly modified viruses. Because playing UP this risk gives credence to those that want to (1) continue all this spend on virology and hangers-on, (2) vaccine creators (just in case!) and of course (3) all the other vested interests who jumped on the bandwagon in 2020 so as to make a quick buck. The bigger win would be discredit these GoFers as charlatans who have created a 'problem/solution' paradigm that would not have existed if they hadn't started finding all these 'novel' viruses in the first place...
This article specifically refers to the HART article written in June 2023, endorsed very recently by Andrew Bridgen and I specifically address the statements therein.
SARS-CoV-2 is UNIQUELY novel in that it has inserts not found in any other circulating coronavirus. The reason, we now know for sure, is that SC-2 was created in a lab, with those specific and very unique inserts. In the article I reference, cited by Bridgen, HART deny that the SC-2 virus is novel and they failed to acknowledge then that the virus was man-made, so it would be encumbent upon HART to now amend their previous position in line with the evidence, especially as Andrew Bridgen is publicly endorsing their article written in June last year.
June 2023?
The January 2024 article specifically references the "null hypothesis" article which makes the novelty distinction that I quoted above.
HART wrote about (and endorsed) the 'lab leak' theory over two years ago, as referenced above. SC-2 therefore being 'novel' is true... the point being made is that all variants are 'novel', and so 'novelty is not novel'.
The danger of hyping SC-2 as being a 'novel lab leak' is that it gives the 'pandemic preparedness' crew exactly what they want: (1) a scared populace that demands (2) huge budgets for 'biosecurity' and more pharmaceutical countermeasures.
I think everyone would agree with you that those who created the chimera (that HART wrote about in 2021 in an article that has been repeatedly referenced) should face the full force of the law.
Saying "all variants are new", therefore novel is NOT novel." is, IMV, nonsense when discussing a man made GOF variant. I can find dozens of quotes about the flu like mildness of Covid. They are correct in the narrow perspective of CFR. Yet there are dozens of peer review reports about multiple complex long term issues with the spike, not associated with any flu, or sometimes very very infrequently, relative to Covid. The harms of the vaccine and the Covid virus, are long, complex, and nearly identical.
Minimising the crime of GOF research that produced Covid, is to invite it again. US and China policy is doing just that. China said "it is liike a cold." The US does less then 10 percent of the testing they formerly did. Policy is 180 degrees from when they hyped Covid. They are responsible for both the viral and vaccine harms, and need to be accountable for both.
But they've been doing this for twenty plus years. Do you think SARS-CoV-2 is the first and only GoF release? Far more reasonable to assume they are all GoF outputs.
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not minimising the GoF crimes, not am I minimising the jab crimes. Far from it! Defund / shut down the lot, I say.
But be nuanced and don't swallow the "official" lab leak story. They want you to think a point leak in late Nov 2019 ran away and infected the world, thus justifying their lockdowns, the masks and the jabs.
Truth is they've been running leaky establishments for years, and SARS-CoV-2 took years of swarming/varying/spreading until they were able shine the spotlight on it with a particular diagnostic test.
There is no 'official' lab leak story. They denied it and still do. 'They' emphasise that by far the greater risk of a deadly pandemic is a 'spillover' from an animal to human host, most likely because of an imaginary 'climate crisis'. They themselves have downplayed the risk of a lab leak of a GOF virus. The true origin of SC-2 has not been revealed because of any story-telling on the part of the establishment, it has been painstakingly uncovered by diligent researchers and scientists who have had to carefully piece together the evidence and thus identify the criminals responsible.
I wrote about the lab leak over two years ago. They didn't want to to think that then, because of you'd thought that then you (not you, you know what I mean: "average citizen who went along with lockdown") would have pushed back against authorities for allowing the nonsense, and you'd have been less likely to take the jab.
Now that you've taken the jab (not you or me, of course...) they want you to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing this tune.
The tune needs to be refined to say that ALL GoF must end AND THE CONTAGION FILM-STYLE FAIRYTALES ARE JUST THAT: FAIRYTALES.
By that same logic, nobody is going to get jabbed for the new Disease X lab leak virus then, especially as people have been dropping dead all over the world because of the Covid jabs.
Here's a classic from the pandemic preparedness crowd: https://twitter.com/BohemianAtmosp1/status/1749103386429923699
With bonus climate boiling link!! 😂
PS. "seek and ye shall find":
Let me finish by discussing a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology back in 2010. The researchers conducted a large-scale comprehensive screening (using a sensitive PCR test) for all four coronaviruses by analysis of 11,661 diagnostic respiratory samples collected in Edinburgh over 3 years between July 2006 and June 2009. And what did they find? “Coronaviruses were detected in 0.3[%] to 0.85% of samples in all age groups. Generally, coronaviruses displayed marked winter seasonality between the months of December and April and were not detected in summer months, which is comparable to the pattern seen with influenza viruses… A total of 11[%] to 41% of coronaviruses detected were in samples testing positive for other respiratory viruses”.
Sound familiar? That is because it is. It happens every year in northern latitudes during autumn and winter. The years 2006 to 2009 were not pandemic – or epidemic – years, and neither is 2020 to 2021. Also the PCR test currently in use is not specific, and is known to pick up other coronaviruses. There is no overriding correlation – let alone causation – linking all the restrictions we are suffering to an amelioration of respiratory disease, which happens every year. There is also no sign whatsoever of exponential growth of cases, hospitalisations or mortality, or an excessive burden on health services due to ‘coronavirus’. It is the restrictions – bubbles, mandatory quarantines, distancing, closures – that are putting pressure on services, and as such are a problem of the government’s own making.
(from Dec 2020! https://twitter.com/AlexStarling77/status/1339300970988249090)
Alex, your assertion.. (correted to clairfy what I think you are aserting...
" Now that the population has taken the jab (not you, of course...) they want the people to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing tune."
I find illogical. If, as is accurate, GOF research was cause of a global pandemic, then it cannot logically lead to allowing more GOF research.
If those who skirted GOF laws are correctly held accountable, and the more severe the crime the more vigourous the pursuit of justice should be, then the punishment should be more severe, leading to greater deterence of repeat offense. As to preventing future tyranny in the name of pandemic response, pointing out that the very people responsible for the global pandemic, are likewise responsible for the response including the vaccines that was cause to even greater death, and vast economic harm to the world. (In short global tyranny one world government is a disaster in every way) Truth is always the best course.
Confused by your question.
Truth is the best course. Which is why this article (https://www.hartgroup.org/a-grandee-exits-stage-left/) got published in 2021, not last week.
I agree that we should point at the GoFers (and their henchmen) and bring them to book for wasting money, time and for decades of fiddled viruses that may or may not have been involved with people becoming ill. Viruses are just part of the furniture, some are dangerous, some not. Look at the 2010 coronavirus paper I referenced above.
But accuse those GoFers at the same time as ratcheting DOWN how risky these viruses are, whether zoonotic, entirely man-made, or a mixture, or a huge suite of slightly modified viruses. Because playing UP this risk gives credence to those that want to (1) continue all this spend on virology and hangers-on, (2) vaccine creators (just in case!) and of course (3) all the other vested interests who jumped on the bandwagon in 2020 so as to make a quick buck. The bigger win would be discredit these GoFers as charlatans who have created a 'problem/solution' paradigm that would not have existed if they hadn't started finding all these 'novel' viruses in the first place...