My Letter to the Prime Minister on Digital ID
Everyone should write to their MP, minister or prime minister to register their disgust
This morning I wrote to the prime minister about his government's Digital ID bill. I am sharing it here to allow others to see what I wrote and determine if they also wish to write to the PM or other elected officials who are responsible for this attempt at changing our way of life.
As a concerned citizen worried about how covid came into existence, the FBI stating that it was man made, refuting Dr Anthony Fauci's convenient and far fetched claim that it emerged from the Wuhan Wet Market, what is being done apart from former prime minister Scott Morrison's attempts to hold China to account?
Given China was not interested in that inquiry, it placed tariffs on Australian exports which were only just removed on wine making, with the Australian government rejoicing. A win is a win, right? Wrong.
Instead what we get to see last week is Senator Katy Gallagher gloating that the Digital ID bill passed the Senate (without debate).
Why was this bill started in the Senate? Why was no debate allowed and why did you choose to avoid the House of Representatives for the first reading? Clearly this is a strategy and I would appreciate a proper answer.
On Digital ID itself, it is being sold to us as for our safety and convenience and will not be compulsory. Well, the government and the opposition sold us the same message over covid vaccinations passing the onus of mandates to the States and then to businesses who felt compelled and corralled.
Only now we learn that companies will bear the brunt of any injury claims. Former government minister Greg Hunt said the vaccines were safe and effective. The TGA, whom he relied on revealed in a FOIA that it did not hold patient level data before making that decision.
(When you recall how he angled to say how the slow approach in Australia was based on safety, one wonders how the reporters completely missed this glaring fact above and of course the performance of the jab was abysmal and not safe.
Fast forward to 12 mins 50 for his reference to the largest experiment ever, but it is well worth watching this entire interview again to pick out how many falsehoods were presented and Hunt’s clever language.)
Hunt told the public it was the largest experiment involving the Australian people. Hunt then gave vaccine makers indemnity. How many advantages can a government minister provide without actual supporting evidence?
(Safe and effective? Former NSW Minister Victor Dominello sporting a bout of Bell’s Palsy in 2021)
Therefore we arrive at digital ID. Already businesses are rejecting cash, legal tender, presumably for their convenience, you don't put up a sign saying 'no cash' if no one is using it. That excuse will not wash.
So, how will the government insure that digital ID remains voluntary if businesses soon reject other forms of ID like they do cash insisting that only digital ID be preferred or encouraged...euphemisms for compulsory without saying it?
Government behaviour creates form. The government and opposition have form in nudging the public before corralling it into its wishes. Now, with 30 years of government policy leaning towards privatisation, Telstra, Commonwealth Bank, Poles and Wires as examples of this suggesting government is ill equipped for dynamics of efficiency the private sector is supoosed to have, then how does the narrative flip when a succession of data hacks concerning private health and telcos expose its customers private digital information?
How does the government then overlook this and immediately without investigation or remedy push ahead with its plans to centralise digital identity data plans without having a proper discussion with the people who either are unaware or do not want it.
Quite frankly, we are sick to the eye teeth of watching our autonomy traded off with big tech and big government for OUR safety and convenience. Safety and convenience.
Yet you avoid scrutiny and inquiry. Australia used to be a free country. It is not. It is sadly now captured under a globalist umbrella pushing an agenda that promotes fear for action. Actions that are unwanted, unneeded and are an actual disservice to our daily and long term lives.
This government has not earnt the right to reduce liberties under the guise of anything when it refuses to be held to account.
Digital ID is a line in the sand that breaches this. I shall await your response which I expect will be forwarded to Minister Gallagher.
Sincerely, Jason Olbourne
(Paragraphs in brackets have been added to this stack but not included in my original letter. Feel free to use any part of this letter to write to your representative.)
Post Script:
In Dominello’s case the obfuscators were in full swing denying any causal link between his Astra Zeneca shot and Bell’s Palsy. This clip from Channel 10 Sydney explains. Link is via Facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=6607532775927369 Meanwhile, in the video, Dominello wears an eye patch over his right eye.
Meantime, the ABC got out ahead of the curve and denied any link altogether.
Link here https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-19/nsw-minister-victor-dominello-bells-palsy-press-conference/100389606
And yet despite the denials and obfuscations, including the untouchable W.H.O, well here is a study, that links Bell’s Palsy to guess what? Astra Zeneca.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961047/#:~:text=The%20results%20of%20our%20cases,and%20Sputnik%20V%20vaccines%2C%20respectively.
And below this it reads…
“The ratio was higher after the first dose compared to the second dose and was higher among those who took Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine compared to other vaccines.”
The study then reminds the reader that the benefits of vaccination far outweighs any potential risks.
How does anyone trust politicians or scientists anymore?
https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/advice-for-providers/clinical-guidance/tts#:~:text=References-,AstraZeneca%20is%20no%20longer%20available%20in%20Australia,TTS%20was%20very%20rare.