In the world of digital content, it's crucial to ensure that the information I share is accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. I take this responsibility seriously. To accomplish this, I utilize cutting-edge AI technology to meticulously fact check every substack before it's published. This ensures that my readers receive the most accurate and up-to-date information.
Fact checking is not just about verifying the truthfulness of the information; it's about upholding the integrity of my platform and maintaining the trust of my readers. That's why I prioritize fact checking so highly. I believe in transparency and accountability, and so I’m committed to being as transparent as possible about the fact-checking process.
Before any article is published, it goes through rigorous analysis from Factiverse, a cutting-edge AI fact checking tool that scours the internet for articles from academic institutions, media outlets, government sources, and more and compares it to the article content I have written.
Occasionally, sources of information will contradict each other. When there is no clear consensus of factual claims on an issue, I use Findsight and I Ask AI to find academic and published sources that cover the factual dispute. However, I realize Findsight and I Ask AI have a liberal bias by nature of the fact that most institutions are in a liberal information bubble. So when these sources do not present research from a diverse background of sources, I attempt to locate any primary sources I can find on the subject and use my best judgement.
Once there are not any more discovered factually inaccurate claims, I publish the article.
My commitment to fact checking extends beyond just checking the mere facts, however. I also strive to provide primary sources whenever possible. But, I understand that there are instances where secondary or tertiary sources might be necessary. In such cases, I do my best to ensure that these sources are credible and relevant to the topic at hand.
I value your feedback and welcome your input. If you come across any statements that you believe are factually inaccurate or have any concerns about the factual accuracy of my substacks, please don't hesitate to reach out to me. Your feedback could help me ensure that my Substack remains a reliable source of information.
At the root of it, I stand by the factual accuracy of my work. I strive to provide you with the most accurate information possible. And while I use advanced AI technology to help me in this endeavor, I remain committed to human oversight and editorial judgment in line with this article’s described methods.