Judge Boasberg Denies Trump’s Attempt to Lift Deportation Block, Reasserts Rule of Law

DOGE (Department of Government EXTINCTION) TRACKER UPDATE

Configure Email Updates for the DOGE Tracker Below

If You Believe in This Fight, Help Keep It Alive

The DOGE Tracker Update is right below, but before that I need just a moment:

The American Manifesto and the DOGE Tracker are not backed by corporations. There are no ads, no paywalls, no billionaires funding it.

It’s just one person, fighting like hell to expose the truth and give you the weapons to push back.

If you value this work—if you want this movement to keep growing, keep calling out fascism without fear, and keep fighting for the future we deserve—then I need your support.

Join the fight. Become a supporter. Every contribution keeps this mission alive.

Because silence is surrender. We do not surrender. We are #TheRelentless.

---

DOGE v. The Constitution

🔴 UPDATE: March 24, 2025
Federal Judge Denies Trump Administration's Motion to Lift Restraining Order on Deportations

In a decisive rebuke to the Trump administration's defiance of judicial authority, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg has denied the government's motion to vacate the temporary restraining order (TRO) that halted the deportation of Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act. This ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rule of law amid escalating tensions between the executive branch and the courts.

Key Developments:

• Judge Boasberg's Firm Stance: Despite intense pressure from the administration, Judge Boasberg refused to lift the TRO, emphasizing the necessity of due process and legal protections for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status.

• Administration's Defiance and Criticism: President Trump has openly criticized Judge Boasberg, labeling him a "radical left" judge and calling for his impeachment—a move that has drawn sharp rebukes from legal experts and fellow jurists who view it as an attack on judicial independence.

• Legal and Constitutional Implications: The administration's attempt to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 for mass deportations has sparked significant legal debate, with critics arguing that its application in this context is unprecedented and legally dubious. ​

The Real Story: Who Wins and Who Pays the Price?

Winners: The judiciary and proponents of constitutional checks and balances emerge strengthened, as Judge Boasberg's ruling reaffirms the courts' role in curbing executive overreach and protecting individual rights.​

Losers: The Trump administration faces a significant setback in its aggressive immigration policies, highlighting the limits of executive power when confronted with legal constraints.​

🔍 Why This Matters:

This ruling serves as a critical reminder that no branch of government operates above the law. The judiciary's ability to check executive actions is fundamental to maintaining the balance of power and safeguarding democratic institutions.​

🚨 The Bottom Line:

Judge Boasberg's decision to uphold the restraining order against the Trump administration's deportation efforts is a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle to preserve the rule of law in the face of attempts to undermine judicial authority. It underscores the importance of an independent judiciary in holding the executive branch accountable.​

📌 Sources:

• New Republic: Judge Rejects Trump’s Deportation Plan, Warns It’s Doomed to Fail

• RedState: Breaking: Judge Boasberg Rules on Trump Admin's Motion to Vacate Order Blocking TdA Deportations

• CourtListener: Memorandum Opinion Denying Motion to Vacate TRO – Judge Boasberg

Join the Fight, Amplify the Truth

Because silence is surrender. We never surrender. We are #TheRelentless.