Contaminated COVID shots: DNA, SV40 promoters, pseudouridine, frameshifting, nonsense proteins and cancer
Let's also talk about heavy metals, chemical and bacterial contaminants, and zero evidence of what's SUPPOSED to be in childhood vaccines on the market for years.
On December 10, 2023, Facebook and Instagram enacted a “scorched earth” decimation of Dr. Naomi Wolf’s research and information, wiping out all of her content and sending threats to anyone who dared to post anything related to “Dr. Naomi Wolf” or her organization, “Daily Clout.” Facebook users who shared her information were hit with messages that included threats of being accused of “terrorism.”
I have been a very active Facebook user since 2008. The censorship of my content has been pretty upsetting and challenging, although thankfully, nothing like what Dr. Wolf is experiencing. The latest incident of censorship in my case happened on Saturday, December 16th, when I attempted to share a video of me speaking with Polly Tommey about residual DNA in vaccines made using aborted fetal tissue and cells, and how Insertional Mutagenesis from DNA contamination is related to the rise in childhood cancers, autism, and may be a possible contributing factor in the rise of gender identity disorder/gender dysphoria. I learned some time ago to not use certain words in my Facebook posts, and not to post video or other links in the main post, but to include the links in the comments. In the photo below, my attempt to share the video is the post on the bottom of the screen shot. It now shows 25 shares and 35 comments. Those comments and those shares only came after I posted the plea for help (the post on the top of the screen shot) in getting me visible again.
As a comparison, two days prior, I made a post about 3D-printed meat. That post has been shared more than 1,200 times in the past four days and as a result of that post, I have gained an additional 100+ followers, pushing the current total to over 44,000 Facebook followers.
I include this information to say this: When I make a post about something that is considered “controversial” and there is ZERO interaction immediately or for the following few hours, I know I’ve been censored. When it happens that fast and when my feed goes from being VERY ACTIVE to SILENT, it generally means that whatever I am trying to share is exactly “over the target.” In this case, it appears that DNA contamination and Insertional Mutagenesis are particularly worrisome (threatening) to those who are behind the censorship.
Here is the video that got me (temporarily) silenced:
Watch the video here: Marcella on Religious Exemptions
NOTE: I have learned that Rumble has been the victim of a series of cyber-attacks over the past week, and that appears to be the reason for the video not being accessible for a while. It is now back up on Rumble. It is also available to view on Bitchute at this link.
Here is where you can find the Power Point referenced in the video above.
I initially put together the presentation on Fetal DNA in MMR and Varicella (chickenpox) vaccines given to children back in 2015 and noted then that the concerns about oncogenesis from residual DNA substrates had been “a concern” noted by the FDA for nearly fifty years at that time. A “concern” they never bothered (refused) to look into. The following six slides are from my presentation, You Can’t be Pro-Life and Pro-Vaccine (2015).
FDA presentations dating back to 1986 document the agency’s “concerns” about “Major Issues Associated with Residual Cell-Substrate DNA.”
“It’s not just cancer…” According to research conducted by SoundChoice Pharmaceuticals, residual DNA from aborted fetuses used in the production of the MMR and Varicella vaccines is also strongly associated with the increase in autism spectrum disorders (ASD).
The limit for residual DNA from fetal cell lines in vaccines was set at 10 ng/dose due to concerns about “Major Issues Associated with Residual Cell-Substrate DNA.”
In their analysis of the contents of the MMR and Varicella vaccines, SoundChoice found that the amount of residual DNA present in the vials greatly exceeded the limits set by WHO.
Sharing information about DNA contamination and/or Insertional Mutagenesis will get you censored. And the censorship about this issue has ramped up considerably in the last few weeks. It is my complete belief that the reason for this is because Dr. Wolf’s reporting about the concerns related to the COVID-19 injections is zeroing in on the target.
Recently, there have been growing concerns from independent researchers and scientists about DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, raising concerns about whether the DNA contamination may be a factor in the rapidly growing incidence of cancers, including exceptionally aggressive cancers being referred to as “turbo cancers.”
The first video I watched about this was from the program American Thought Leaders produced by Asher Press. It’s a fascinating and terrifying hour-long interview in which Kevin McKernan describes the results of research into the COVID-19 vaccines, which revealed SV40 virus promoters and levels of DNA contamination that were up to 10 times the limits allowed. McKernon also notes that because of the nature of COVID-19 vaccines and the effects of lipid nano-particles increasing the uptake of residual DNA into host cells, the limits set by WHO for vaccines that do not contain lipid nano-particles are inappropriate for assessment of the danger in COVID-19 vaccines.
You can access the research discussed in the video here. And here is a good write-up describing their findings, published on Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack.
So now we know that the COVID-19 vaccines contain levels of DNA that exceed the FDA and WHO limits, and that the DNA in the COVID-19 vaccines is likely even more of a problem because of the lipid nano-particles, which makes integration into the vaccinee’s own cells more of an issue than it otherwise might be.
Enter Dr. Naomi Wolf and Frameshifting…
I started this post by referencing the December 10th attack on Dr. Naomi Wolf and her organization, DailyClout. As Dr. Wolf noted in her write-up, the attack came immediately after she posted the video of her interview with Steve Bannon, in which she sounded the alarm about frameshifting occurring from the COVID-19 vaccines.
“Facebook’s and Instagram’s censorship of DailyClout — and of me personally — yesterday followed my posting of an interview I did with Steve Bannon on his widely viewed podcast WarRoom, in which I explained that scientists had confirmed that the mRNA injections cause ‘frameshifting’, or the production of ‘nonsense’ proteins, with unknown outcomes.”
Watch the 16 minute video here. I recommend watching it at least twice. Dr. Wolf does a fantastic job of explaining “frameshifting” and what it means when it comes to cancer.
Here is where you can access the article referred to in the video above. You can download the pdf for free, which is a good idea as things like this sometimes tend to disappear or become more difficult to find as time goes on.
“The (COVID-19) injections have an ingredient in them that is causing frameshifting. And what frameshifting is, is a disruption of reading the code, the synthetic code, in such a way that the body creates “nonsense proteins.” About thirty percent of the people who’ve taken the injection have a state of inflammation as a result of this, and no one knows how long it’s going to go on… What happened is this: For the mRNA COVID shots, naturally occurring uridine was replaced. Pfizer and Moderna replaced that with something called N-methylpseudouridine, which is a uridine analog. Pseudo means artificial or fake, right? They did this because the human body often attacks RNA, which has natural uridine as a base, and treats it as a foreign invader. So, the people who formulated the injection hoped, did not know, that by using N-methylpseudouridine, that would prevent that attack. But what’s happening is that when the body reads the partially synthetic code, the methylpseudouridine, it struggles with this replacement and that struggle is like a record that skips a couple of lines. This then messes up protein creation. Because the replacement, the N-methylpseudouridine is not an exact fit for what the body is expecting, that is uridine, that can be a momentary pause in the protein creation process which causes the process to falter and a letter in the code to potentially get skipped… This is the dangerous and scary part. That process, which is called “frameshifting,” messes up how the code is interpreted by the body and causes the code to come out jumbled. So, the body then attacks the foreign, weirdo nonsense protein that is produced, which causes an immune system flare-up.”
Dr. Wolf goes on to discuss how a great many of the adverse events listed in the Pfizer documents have as their root cause a chronic inflammatory process. She mentions arthritis and increases in joint issues, including hip replacements, knee replacements, and connective tissue injuries. Asthma is also noted as the result of increased inflammation of the airways. Neurological conditions, chronic pain… all of these things have inflammation as a root cause. Dr. Wolf goes on to talk about how these “nonsense proteins,” which are the result of “frameshifting,” which is the result of N1-methylpseudouridine in the COVID injections may help to explain the increase in cancers of all kinds.
In the video, Dr. Wolf mentions that one of the researchers associated with DailyClout, Dr. Daniel Demers, published an article in May of 2022, expressing concerns about the use of N1-methylpseudouridine in the COVID-19 injections. It’s a fascinating report and raises further questions about WHY the mRNA manufacturers chose to use N1-methylpseudouridine, given the known and perhaps more importantly, unknown issues that have been raised by researchers since 2012.
“They went in knowing that there would be this dangerous, possibly very risky unknown, that now needs to be fixed.” – Dr. Naomi Wolf
Bannon asks Dr. Wolf about the plans for development of a new, mRNA based vaccine for cancer prevention. They go on to discuss something that has been evident to parents of vaccine-injured children for many years. The following photo shows the son of one of my Facebook friends. This young man was injured by vaccines in infancy and was later diagnosed with autism. The prescription bottles on the table in front of him show what he was prescribed during a one-year time frame as a teenager.
The pharmaceutical industry creates the problems so they can sell the drugs to cover up the symptoms of the syndromes they, themselves created. It’s a brilliant business model. As an example, Dr. Wolf notes that Pfizer bought the rights to the medication to treat heart inflammation five years before releasing its injection that causes heart inflammation. Of course they are now in the process of developing a vaccine for cancer. That should have been completely predictable, given the history of the industry.
Will the FDA respond to the concerns about DNA contamination, N1-methylpseudouridine, Frameshifting, and “Nonsense Proteins?” It’s highly doubtful. Afterall, they’ve known about the issues when it comes to childhood vaccines since 1986. The only action they have taken in response is to deny, deny, deny. As Dr. Robert Malone and many others are finding out, this is status quo for the agency that is charged with protecting our health from the industry that focuses on profits over people.
Read Dr. Malone’s article here.
Contaminated vaccines are nothing new.
There have been contamination problems with vaccines given to infants and children for decades. What’s new is the increased interest in this issue, and we have the COVID-19 vaccine program to thank for that. This is a lengthy article, and if you are still with me, I want to thank you for hanging in there. I will leave you with two additional bits of information to digest.
First is this:
In 2004 and 2005, long after vaccine manufacturers supposedly removed Thimerosal from childhood vaccines, an independent organization called H.A.P.I. (Health Advocacy in the Public Interest) wanted to find out if the manufacturers were telling the truth, and if mercury had really been removed. H.A.P.I. obtained a few sample vaccines and had them sent to two different labs for independent analysis. The following chart is one of the reports they received:
Archive website: Vaccine Testing | HAPI Health (archive.org)
According to the manufacturer’s insert for Engerix-B vaccine (for Hepatitis B, given to infants on the first day of life and twice more before six months of age), there shouldn’t be any mercury in the vaccine, but it’s there. There definitely shouldn’t be any cadmium, antimony, tin, tungsten, lead, or copper. Where did they come from? And check out the whopping amount of aluminum in Pediarix! That’s well above the 700 mcg aluminum declared in the manufacturer’s insert.
How big is this problem?
It’s not just contaminants we need to worry about. Because the vaccine manufacturers have little to no oversite, and there is zero quality control going on from the FDA, we are left to take the word of the manufacturers about what’s being injected into ourselves and into our babies and children.
In 2018, an Italian research group (Corvelva) analyzed the contents of Infanrix Hexavalent Vaccine (Infanrix Hexa), which is licensed for use in the European Union, Canada, and in “public sector markets of low resource countries.” Infanrix Hexa is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Here is the manufacturer’s insert. Infanrix Hexa is not licensed in the United States. In the U.S., GlaxoSmithKline’s Infanrix vaccine is said to immunize against three childhood infections: Diptheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis, and is given in five doses to infants and young children. Here is the insert for the U.S. version.
What is Infanrix Hexa?
“Infanrix hexa is a vaccine used to protect babies and toddlers against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B, poliomyelitis (polio) and diseases such as bacterial meningitis caused by the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). Infanrix hexa contains the following active substances:
toxoids (chemically weakened toxins) from diphtheria and tetanus;
parts of Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis, a bacterium that causes whooping cough);
parts of the hepatitis B virus;
inactivated polioviruses;
polysaccharides (sugars) from Haemophilus influenzae type b. (source)
What did Corvelva’s analysis reveal?
They found zero evidence of ANY of the six antigens Infanrix is supposed to contain, and which are supposed to provide protective immunity from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, polio, and haemophilus b. influenza. ZERO. The things that were SUPPOSED to be there were NOT THERE.
What they DID find:
Chemical contamination, including chemical toxins, bacterial peptide toxins, and “insoluble and indigestible macromolecules that react to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.”
Sixty-five percent of the compounds found by Corvelva in their analysis of Infanrix Hexa were unknown compounds. Specifically, unknown compounds that react like proteins, but are not recognizable proteins. Are they “nonsense proteins?” You can read the report here.
To summarize the information presented in this post:
There are significant concerns about the COVID-19 injections, including the presence of residual DNA, SV40 promoters, insertional mutagenesis, frameshifting, and “nonsense proteins” from N1-methylpseudouridine used in the manufacture of the mRNA injections.
There have been significant concerns about homologous recombinant DNA and insertional mutagenesis from residual DNA fragments from aborted fetal tissue and cells used in the manufacture of live attenuated viral vaccines (MMR and Varicella) given to young children and these concerns have been known by the FDA and WHO since at least 1986. They have done nothing to address the issue.
There have been multiple independent analyses of vaccines administered to children which have revealed contamination with excessively high rates of residual DNA substrates, heavy metals, chemical and bacterial contamination, and substances which cannot be identified.
In at least one independent analysis, there was ZERO evidence that the vaccine analyzed contained ANY of the antigens for the childhood infections the vaccine was advertised to prevent.
This is NOT an isolated or new issue. It has been going on for a very long time, and it is way past time to put a stop to this fraud and the damage it has been causing.
The Hippocratic "First do no harm." model has been changed to, "First do harm, then have patients for life! (Those aluminum Mercury and squlaine laced vaccines are a real money make for the 5 billion in fruad fines and leader in cause of death, big [evil] pharma's! Who have brought iatrogenic *death to 40,000,000 in just the last 50 years and made trillions doing it! (see the book, Death by Medicine!)
Thank you!