This short writing is based on the video by Neil Oliver, where he chats with well-known YouTube medical expert, Dr John Campbell.
You can find that video here.
There were a number of take-aways from this video, all of which I discuss in the video attached to this post, however I also thought I would document these in written format for any who don’t want to sit and watch an hour-long video.
And so, here goes.
The British Government’s Official Website is Inaccurate
The pair discuss the official guidance on the government’s website, referring specifically to the description of the mRNA vaccines as being ‘safe and effective’. Dr John Campbell states that we know this to be untrue now, and that in fact, his analysis of the data available often differs entirely from the interpretation of the data provided by the government.
This leads them both to the conclusion that, I’m sure, we have all reached - that the British government simply can not be trusted.
Healthcare is about Treating the Individual
An interesting part of the discussion between Oliver and Campbell is about the nature of healthcare itself; and the relationship between the medical expert and the patient.
They discuss how ludicrous it is to consider an individual taking a medical intervention for the sake of a third party; and as we now know, the basis of doing this was a complete lie. The idea that healthy individuals should take an experimental drug in order to ‘save granny’, only to later find out that it was never tested to see whether it could prevent transmission, and furthermore, was producing incredibly harmful side-effects and even death, is unconscionable.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, we’ve since seen a media (paid for by our government, using our taxes) attempting to mislead us into thinking that a range of other things is causing the resulting heart attacks and sudden deaths, including gardening and excitement from watching Avatar 2.
Vaccinated due to Trust in Authority
Dr John Campbell explains that the reason he was vaccinated with the mRNA drug, despite the lack of available data at the time, was due to his trust in the medical and governmental authorities. He goes on to express regret with this decision, though it probably does explain why the majority of ordinary members of the public also received the COVID vaccine.
Much to my own personal dismay, the majority of my countrymen these days seem to consider the government an authority over us, despite the fact that we, the public, are supposed to be the authority in our free societies.
Just as we treat celebrities as our superiors, leading them to become arrogant and to also consider themselves to be our superiors; considering politicians to be our authority for so long appears to have convinced them they are.
As a result, they don’t seem to be the least bit concerned that we might actually seek to hold them accountable for blatant crimes against us, and even as I write this, they sit in Davos discussing ways that they can tag, monitor and control how we behave.
The Unreliability of PCR Tests
The two briefly touch on PCR tests, and Oliver asked Campbell whether he thinks they are a reliable means of testing whether someone has COVID.
Dr Campbell explains how the tests work, and talks briefly about how the higher the number of cycles, the less reliable the data. It reminded me of the creator of PCR tests, Kary Mullis, and how he himself described the tests as being unreliable when testing for something in this manner. Coincidentally, Mullis died shortly before all of this chaos began.
So essentially, if you wanted to get a specific result with tests, you could test yourself over and over and there was a good chance you’d get it. Just think of all the false positives people were getting, and as a result of actually being healthy, locked themselves away from the rest of society.
It’s important to note that the government obviously knew all of this was happening, yet allowed it continue.
The Suppression of Cheap Drugs, and the Experts that Advocated them
Censorship was something I became very familiar with during my time living in China, and indeed, self-censorship. This was when I would openly voice my concerns around the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) only to be warned by my friends that I shouldn’t talk about those things. Thus, I stopped.
Never would I imagine that this kind of thing could be adopted in the West, and in Britain. Yet, with our politicians having colluded with the CCP for so long, it was inevitable, I suppose, that they too would try to introduce it.
And so the two discussed how cheap alternatives to fight COVID, as well as important voices who advocated for them, were suppressed in order to protect the commercial interests of Pfizer and other big mRNA producers.
While this took place, I’m sure we recall the media’s role in all of this, especially where Ivermectin was concerned. The corrupt mainstream media was quick to pounce on any story getting out that supported the effectiveness of alternatives to the vaccine, most notably with Joe Rogan and his use of Ivermectin.
Their ability to weave popular cultures out of thin air, and to convince those who buy into it to attack, ridicule and dehumanise any who dare criticise such pop cultures is proven.
Dr John Campbell explains in this part of the chat that pharmaceutical companies are part of an industry and want to make money, much like any other company. It becomes clear that our health is of little concern when put against the possibility of making a profit, and their sponsorship of the media meant that no debate could possibly take place to ascertain the best possible intervention for COVID.
What’s Causing the Increased Excess Deaths?
It is clear during this part of the chat that Dr John Campbell believes it to be impossible to rule out that COVID vaccines could have played a part in the number of excess deaths we’re seeing. He states that the official line is that it is due to a disruption of our healthcare, and while that may be true in some way, there are other factors that could be causing the deaths.
It seems reasonable to assume that with reduced access to healthcare, all those suffering from other illnesses (e.g. cancer) will be more likely to die as a result.
However, later we also learn more about what an mRNA vaccine is, and therefore a reasonable person would find it difficult to rule out this being a probable cause of the excess deaths.
As a digression:
I believe that if we were to blame a disruption in healthcare, caused by the “COVID pandemic”, then we are effectively supporting the attempt by our treacherous politicians to avoid accountability. After all, they were unprecedented times and they made the best decisions they could at the time.
In actual fact, the cause of COVID, the numbers of those infected and who died from COVID, the availability of cheap and effective drugs available to fight the virus, and even the range of experts who could advise the public were either censored, distorted, or suppressed.
Any attempt to perceive politicians, media and businesses involved in the chaos that ultimately led to a disruption in our healthcare as simply negligent is, in my opinion, misguided. They acted with intention, and I think we can see that demonstrated, as they’ve moved effortlessly from attempting to impose authoritarian restrictions on us under the guise of pandemic response policies, to attempting to impose authoritarian restrictions on us under the guise of climate change policies.
Ultimately, it’s all about the restrictions.
Excess Deaths not Receiving Expected Attention
Here, Dr John Campbell also expresses his concern that the scientific community doesn’t seem to be as interested in the phenomenon of excess deaths that one might expect.
Oliver asks why an investigation can’t be opened up to ascertain what’s causing them, but I think it’s quite clear to us all by this point why this would be difficult to achieve.
We are collectively aware now that our media is being paid and controlled by the very people who are likely to have caused the increase in excess deaths. Therefore an investigation would only reveal their complicity.
An investigation being carried out by members of the scientific community is equally unlikely. Scientists are funded, and this funding often comes from the very companies that produced the mRNA vaccines.
There is a very unfortunate truth in the reality we currently find ourselves, which is that a dog doesn’t bite the hand that feeds it.
And we are surrounded by dogs.
The Pharmaceutical Industry is Interested in Selling us Drugs
Perhaps one of the most interesting parts of the chat between Neil Oliver and Dr John Campbell is when the true nature of the pharmaceutical industry, on which so many rely, was discussed.
The truth is simple: They are more interested in making a profit than protecting our health.
This becomes apparent when Dr Campbell reveals that there have been occasions when a drug, that could wipe out a particular medical issue, would be suppressed in order to protect an already-established profitable drug that was being used to treat the issue. In other words, instead of selling a single drug, it was much more profitable to sell a course of drugs that one would have to take for the rest of their life.
This also got me thinking about Cancer.
Knowing what we do about the pharmaceutical industry, why on Earth would we ever expect to see a cure when, not only is it contributing toward a depopulation agenda, but it would effectively end a very profitable line of treatments?
Another thing I found myself pondering was whether advertising campaigns, which often feature horrific physical images involving hair and weight loss, were actually misleading people into thinking that such side effects were a result of the cancer rather than treatment like Chemotherapy.
Am I correct in my assertion that the loss of hair and gaunt appearance are not the results of Cancer on the body, but of the treatment supplied by the pharmaceutical company?
If so, then I would argue such a move proves we are not dealing with Humans here, but of a very different, more vile, sub-Human species which is entirely bereft of compassion.
Re-Imagining Vaccines Forever - MRNA
Perhaps the most concerning topic for discussion came at the end.
In the news recently, we discovered that the British government had signed a deal with Moderna that would mean mRNA vaccines were to be mass-produced on British soil.
This, combined with news that the traditional vaccine is to be replaced entirely with the mRNA version, should give us all cause for concern.
Dr John Campbell spent a few minutes explaining the difference here between a traditional vaccine and the mRNA version.
Briefly, and paraphrased:
The traditional vaccine involves a dead virus being introduced to the body, where it is recognised as a foreign agent and antibodies are produced by the immune system as a result.
Future infections will be dealt with by the immune system, which is now familiar with the particular virus.
The mRNA vaccine involves a message being sent in a lipid nanoparticle to a cell, instructing it to create the virus within the cell itself based on the blueprint provided in the message. The body then produces antibodies in the same way it usually would.
Apologies if my description is not perfect, but this is my understanding of the explanation given.
The problem comes with the following part.
We may have all heard stories about how the RNA would remain in the injection site - the arm. We may have dismissed news that this was wrong, and that it was travelling around the entire body, because we didn’t really understand the implications.
Dr John Campbell continues his explanation by talking about the inflammation that can occur where the immune response is generated. If this is in the arm, then you’ll get a sore arm. However, if indeed the RNA can travel anywhere in the body, and the immune response occurs in, say, the heart, then that would be where the inflammation takes place.
There have been numerous reports of inflammation of the myocardium (known as myocarditis) which has resulted in that person potentially suffering a heart attack.
I will say again, simply to cover my back, that it is worth watching the video of the chat between Neil Oliver and John Campbell to interpret the information given yourself, however this has been my understanding of it.
To me, there is absolutely no mystery around why people everywhere are keeling over with heart attacks, and the propaganda of the corrupt WEF-owned media to attempt to blame this on climate change or gardening has no influence on me whatsoever.
The only mysteries that remain for me, at a time when we watch the media (and the media regulator, OFCOM) sit in Davos for the WEF conference, is why we, the free people of Western society, continue to do nothing in response to what is now a blatant attack.
Given that there is absolutely no long-term data, and the short-term data has produced horrifying results; one who is of reasonable mind can only presume that when they see their government continuing on with a deal with Moderna, and they see recognised war criminal, Tony Blair, in Davos pushing for a China-style technocratic police state to ensure we are all vaccinated with mRNA, then that reasonable person can only conclude that we are at war.
Neil Oliver chats with Dr John Campbell