Many people suggest there is no evidence of an illegitimate election this past November 2020. First, let’s start off by saying that election security must occur before the ballots hit the machines, particularly in Wisconsin. Once a ballot is counted, there is no way of knowing which ballots were cast legally and there is no way of knowing who cast that ballot. That is the main reason that those who are paying attention understand that the Wisconsin Elections Commission’s (WEC) failure to do their job was so damning.
The first step in discussing the “big steal” is to determine what we mean by the word “steal.” If you come out of the store and your car is gone, chances are it has been stolen - if of course, your payments have been made on time. Stealing an election is a bit more procedural than physical. There will be no video of four big guys jumping out of a white van, throwing a blanket over the election, and dragging it into the back of the van. The question should really be: did the winner win honestly or was there enough cheating to sway the result? Let’s take a deeper look.
Although this particular discussion revolves around Wisconsin’s election, we all watched the footage of what was going on in democrat-ran cities in swing states all around the country, namely Detroit, Philadelphia, Phoenix, and Atlanta. It seemed that every swing state had multiple issues and a ton of Zuckerberg money. Fake water pipe bursts and crates of ballots in Georgia. Boarded up windows where ballots were being counted, and republican observers being denied access. The common thread was every one of these states illegally changed their voting laws to increase turnout in democrat areas.
Elections in America require an honest and fair press. When the majority of the media hides factual stories about Hunter Biden, his laptop, and his and his father’s business dealings with foreign governments, including China and Ukraine, while promoting fake news stories like Charlottesville, the election is already tainted. Having social media monopolies perfectly willing to skew the information highway adds to the illegitimacy of the election. Google, Facebook, and Twitter don’t even bother to hide their bias against Trump (and all republicans). We won’t even talk about Hollywood, the music industry, or our education system. Our colleges have moved solidly to the left as they openly bully students into buying into the left-wing propaganda. Certainly, no astute observer could argue that colleges offer an environment that nurtures free speech and healthy debate. To make a long story short, the election was not an honest one from the get-go. The three presidential debates were inexcusably one-sided. I can’t imagine the RNC or the Trump campaign allowing such nonsense to occur. One can’t even blame the democrats. If Republicans are going to be that stupid, then who could blame the Democrats? But none of that is the real story.
Trump received 204,000 more votes in Wisconsin in 2020 than 2016. Many are talking about Trump losing the suburban women, but he gained 204,000 votes somewhere. Again, in Wisconsin, Biden got 67,000 more votes than the eight democrat congressional candidates did. So, Biden is more popular than Gwen Moore, Mark Pocan, Ron Kind, and the others? Joe Biden – the guy who was hiding in his basement and refusing to take hard questions outperformed seasoned congressmen? Overall, Republicans picked up seats in the house. That just doesn’t happen when the candidate for the opposite party wins. We keep hearing about suburban women, but republicans gained house seats across the country.
A county that primarily votes with the winner of the election is called a “bellwether county”; Trump won 18 of the 19. And moreover, Biden (supposedly) got 81 million votes, winning 509 counties, while Obama got 69 million votes, winning 873 counties. What happened? How did Biden get so many more votes in fewer counties? The answer is Zuckerberg money. The Zuckerberg-funded groups worked with the municipal clerks to “get out the vote” in areas with the most democrat voters. In Green Bay, where the clerk wasn’t playing ball with them, the democrat Mayor pushed the clerk out and allowed an Obama operative, Micheal Spitzer-Rubenstein to run their election. See below.
We know that the City of Madison held “democracy in the park” campaigns where 17,251 ballots were harvested and the chain of custody was, not just broken, but non-existent. The City of Madison went for Biden with 84.1% of the vote. Furthermore, “drop boxes” were used extensively in all five Zuckerberg-funded counties. For some reason, Speaker Robin Vos and Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald allowed that to happen. And that was probably the biggest opportunity to cheat, besides perhaps the “indefinitely confined” debacle.
Just before the April election, the County Clerks in both Milwaukee and Dane counties instructed voters to declare themselves “indefinitely confined” so they could receive ballots for all upcoming elections, including the November presidential election, without applying for an absentee ballot. More importantly “indefinitely confined” voters do not need to show an ID. The number of indefinitely confined voters went from 70,000 to 270,000! The indefinitely confined provision is for those who are severely handicapped, to the point that even downloading an ID can be too challenging for them. State Senator Patty Schachtner, who spent the summer campaigning for re-election, declared herself “indefinitely confined” and received a ballot without showing an ID along with 48,544 new voters who have never had an ID on file. Note: 48,544 is over twice the margin of Biden’s victory? Election denying? Hardly!
All of this led to many of us saying, “Hey, I don’t believe Biden got all these votes” and they’re probably right. Not legally anyway. Biden didn’t come out of his basement and yet he topped Obamas vote totals? Sorry, many aren’t buying that. Obama was a fabulous speaker and being a black candidate, he was very appealing to many voters. Biden didn’t take questions, and hence, his mental abilities were already being questioned even before the election. He had no enthusiasm at all. None. Talking to people all around the state you’ll find people say that Trump had overwhelming support in their communities. The $8.8 million of Zuckerberg money was used to “get out the vote” in democrat voting wards in order to offset the huge enthusiasm gap. Although history and common sense shows much reason to doubt that Joe Biden won, most of what we talked about so far, is pure conjecture.
The evidence clearly suggests foul play on a large scale:
The emails obtained via open records requests start in the City of Green Bay. The Green Bay clerk and deputy both quit right after the election. They were pushed out. The emails CLEARLY show that an Obama operative from Brooklyn, New York was given access to the Central Count room, where the absentee ballots were. He was deeply involved with curing the ballots and was given a City of Green Bay identification tag when he was not an employee of the city. ON ELECTION NIGHT! In such a close election, this alone would be grounds to decertify the election.
Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein was the name of this operative and he works for CTCL (Center for Tech and Civic Life), which received $350 million from Mark Zuckerberg. Spitzer-Rubenstein was instrumental in all of the five Wisconsin cities that shared in the $8.2 million from CTCL (Zuckerberg). He also helped in Wauwatosa as the emails show. Furthermore, we know that Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein developed an app that allowed his groups to “get out the democrat vote” using information that was obtained through the election officials in the WI-5 (the name given to the five cities that got Zuckerberg money, Racine, Kenosha, Green Bay, Milwaukee, and Madison). The information that Spitzer-Rubenstein was given from clerks was not available to anyone else. The voter lists he received cost over $10,000 to anyone else. This level of collusion between election officials and partisan groups looking to sway an election is unethical to say the least.
In Milwaukee, Claire Woodall-Vogg is the Elections Administrator. Emails show that several groups and Mr. Spitzer-Rubenstein worked with her to perform a wide range of election tasks that are reserved for those who were duly elected or appointed and have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution. An employee, Ryan Chew, of one of the groups, “The Elections Group,” (led by another democrat operative, Jennifer Morrell) went as far as to send Claire an email at 4:07am (3:07 central time), right after the so-called “ballot dump” congratulating her on finding just the right number of ballots to “get the job done.” Remember, this so-called “non-partisan” group was helping to cure ballots and “get out the votes” in Milwaukee. Any honest person would call that justification for a full audit of what went down in Milwaukee during the November 2020 election.
A common theme with all the partisan outgroups and the five Wisconsin cities (plus Wauwatosa) was ballot curing. Ballot curing is the illegal process of fixing absentee ballots that are not cast properly. These ballots should (by law) be rejected. Of the 2 million (or so) absentee ballots statewide (early in-person, mail-in ballots and illegal ballot drop boxes) only .002% of those ballots (4270) were rejected. The normal rejection rate of ballots is between 2-3% and for 2020 that would have been 40,000-60,000 ballots.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), the agency charged with preventing fraud, was instead responsible for much of the fraud:
Turning now to the actions of WEC, the Wisconsin Elections Commission, and their refusal to follow the law and their inability to instill confidence in the election.
· WEC allowed drop boxes. True the Vote estimates 137,000 ballots were illegally harvested.
· WEC allowed the “Democracy in the Park” debacle.
· WEC allowed the voter rolls to remain bloated with inactive voters until AFTER the election.
· WEC has refused to remove dead voters from the rolls.
· WEC has refused to remove voters that have been found incompetent by the courts from the rolls.
· WEC allowed the clerks from Milwaukee and Dane Counties to encourage people to declare themselves “indefinitely confined” when it is clearly illegal.
· WEC sent out guidance that illegally circumvented the “Special Voting Deputy” provision to protect our most vulnerable citizens living in senior centers from exploitation. This debacle affected 92,000 elderly voters.
· WEC declared Kanye West as ineligible for the ballot because he was 17 seconds late. It is believed by many that he was there before 5:00. Ironically, WEC themselves have not been timely when responding to information requests. Obviously, Mr. West would have cut into Biden votes, so this goes along with EVERYTHING else that WEC did this past election. WEC made sure democrats had as much advantage as they possibly could.
· WEC Chairwoman Ann Jacobs and Governor Tony Evers quickly certified the election before Trump had a chance to file his suit, a clear act of desperation.
· WEC, namely Administrator Meagan Wolfe, received an email from Claire Woodall-Vogg touting the assistance she was getting from Hillary Hall and Michael Spitzer Rubenstein, and within 13 minutes forwarded the email to the other four cities involved in Zuckerberg money, namely Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, and Madison! The simplest google search would have showed that Hillary -Hall was the clerk in Boulder Colorado that was sued twice by the Republican Party for violating the “election observer” provision. Both times, she settled out of court. In addition, she was reprimanded by the Colorado Supreme Court for issuing marriage licenses against state law. She clearly has no regard for election laws in Colorado so why should she have any problem breaking laws in Wisconsin? Ms. Hall is very representative of every “non-partisan” activist that was allowed to circumvent the 2020 November election. Clearly, WEC, namely Meagan Wolfe, gave legitimacy to these questionable groups.
· The extent of WEC’s involvement with the outside groups (described below) is still under investigation.
The Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB) – The Non-Forensic, Non-Audit
The Republican leadership team, which is unquestionably controlled by Speaker Robin Vos spent much of 2021 desperately trying to convince the general public that the LAB was already conducting a forensic audit of the 2020 election. That was a lie. It not only was not a forensic audit, but it also wasn’t an audit at all. It was a report. And of course, the democrats, the media, and republican leadership was more than willing to accept the false claim that the report found no evidence of fraud. This author’s dictionary must be outdated because fraud (according to the LAB, WILL, and Robin Vos) suddenly doesn’t mean the use of trickery, deception, or intentional perversion of the truth to obtain a certain goal. What exactly DID the LAB report uncover?
1. The LAB reviewed 14,710 absentee ballots in 29 municipalities out of the 470,028 that were cast in the Nov 2020 election. They found that 6.9% (1022) of them had incomplete witness addresses. That would mean 32,431 absentee ballots that were illegally cast, just in those in 29 municipalities. There were 1,969,274 absentee ballots cast in Wisconsin, and if the 14710 ballots looked at were statistically representative of the entire group (which they are) one would surmise that 135,880 should have been disqualified, but only 4270 were rejected. From what we know about the WI-5 along with the left-wing outside groups that were helping to “cure ballots” this alone should be cause for great concern regarding the outcome of the 2020 election.
2. The LAB found that 11 clerks held illegal voting events outside their offices.
3. The LAB found that after the clerks in Milwaukee and Dane counties illegally (or should we say, fraudulently) encouraged people to register as “indefinably confined” 48,554 of them voted without EVER having shown an ID.
4. The LAB report found that 40% of clerks did not even attempt to send Special Voting Deputies into nursing homes. 92,000 voters were affected by the elimination of Special voting Deputies.
5. The LAB found that 45,665 registered voters did not match DOT records. For 13,800 of them, no attempt was made to match the information.
6. The LAB found the WEC did not comply with the statutes requiring them to obtain signatures from DOT to match those who registered online. In addition, WEC does not have current data from the Wisconsin Department of Corrections or the Department of Human Services to update the voter rolls regarding deceased voters or felons.
7. Although the LAB report did identify some problems with the voting equipment, such as over-votes occurring where the creases through the write-in fields caused a vote to be falsely counted, the LAB did not thoroughly investigate many of the issues that to this day trouble (rightly or wrongly) many data experts. The machine modems, the data transfer points, and the programming methods were not addressed and remain a legitimate source of concern going forward.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) – Review
Let’s give WILL some credit here, at least they’re not trying to claim they conducted an audit. Here are some points taken directly from the “review.”
1. It is almost certain that in Wisconsin’s 2020 election the number of votes that did not comply with existing legal requirements exceeded Joe Biden’s margin of victory.
2. Failure to follow proper procedures makes fraud more difficult to detect and state law requires that the prescribed procedures for absentee voting are mandatory.
3. More than 265,000 Wisconsin voters adopted the ‘indefinitely confined’ status, meaning they received an absentee ballot and were exempt from the statewide photo ID requirements.
4. State and federal law requires Wisconsin to maintain accurate voter rolls. But the Wisconsin Elections Commission and local clerks refused to take the required steps in 2020 to remove outdated and inaccurate voter registrations—resulting in tens of thousands of active voter registrations tied to old addresses. NOTE: (Bill’s observation) Why won’t WEC fix the voter rolls? Is it because they use it to cheat? I can’t think of another reason, can you?
5. Thousands of votes were cast by individuals remaining on the active Mover’s List.
6. We found that 23,361 Wisconsin voters in 2020 cast ballots despite failing their DMV check this year, meaning their name, address, and/or birthdate doesn’t match what is on file with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
7. We found that 31,664 Wisconsin voters were in the National Change of Address Database.
8. Absentee ballot rejection rates were substantially lower in 2020 than in previous presidential elections.
9. State law provides no legal authority for local election officials to fix, or “cure,” defects, mistakes, or missing information on absentee ballots. But the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) said they could—resulting in some municipalities curing ballots while others did not.
10. While there is a pre-determined allowable number of days available for in-person absentee voting applied statewide, there is no uniform standard of hours available for in-person absentee voting. In general, smaller cities will have fewer hours available than larger cities.
11. The Wisconsin Elections Commission unlawfully suspended the use of Special Voting Deputies for nursing homes and assisted living facilities in 2020—shrugging off standards in state law for the distribution and collection of absentee ballots in those settings. WILL surveyed 35 Wisconsin communities and found just two could provide records for use of Special Voting Deputies in 2020.
12. Private grants for election administration from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), a non-profit largely funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, resulted in an increase in turnout in five Wisconsin cities—all voting heavily for Democrat Joe Biden. CTCL distributed more than $10 million to Wisconsin cities and municipalities in 2020 to assist with election administration and voter education during the pandemic. 86% of the funds were distributed to five Wisconsin cities: Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, and Racine. A statistical analysis finds significant increases in turnout for Democrats, approximately 8,000 votes statewide, as a result of the distribution of CTCL grants. Specifically, Biden’s vote increased by about 41 votes per municipality in cities that received CTCL grants relative to those that did not over 2016. No statistically significant effect was found for Trump.
13. Our poll found a surprisingly high percentage of respondents who say they did not request absentee ballots. A higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats claim they did not request an absentee ballot than of Democrats. Most of those who said they did not request absentee ballots appear to have voted. We could not conclude that this is evidence of fraud, but neither can we exclude it.
But… Nothing to see here, right? Again, let me remind the reader that the purpose of this report is not to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election but only to point out that declaring the 2020 election the “most safe and secure” election ever is not only complete nonsense but that questioning the authenticity of the election is reasonable and our patriotic duty. Having that said, the fact that the federal government, assisted by big tech and the mainstream media, has criminalized the act of questioning the election results. Can it get more concerning than that?
Tony Evers and Josh Kaul provide cover:
One may have a reasonable concern that those who just simply can’t stand the idea that Trump lost the election were too quick to call Joe Biden an “illegitimate president” and Trump the winner. Again, I point out that the purpose of this report is to compile a list of all the different problematic events surrounding the 2020 election. Certainly, one is justified in believing that the election results are not valid. I can go as far as to say I have no confidence in the result of the election, and neither should anyone else. Much more concerning than people shouting “election Fraud” is the fact that the Democrats, the mainstream media, along with Tony Evers and Josh Kaul almost instantaneously locked arms and started chanting “big lie” over and over again. There is no question that not one of these individuals is willing to look at the facts. It is Josh Kaul’s job to investigate. He did not. Just as then WEC chair Ann Jacobs and Gov. Evers rushed to certify the election that not only clearly had problems, but lawsuits were still being adjudicated. There is no way one can look at the actions of AG Kaul and Gov. Evers and say they addressed the concerns of a good number of Wisconsin voters. Even after the evidence of malfeasance was mounting Gov. Evers only advice was “lawyer up.”
For those who think... So? Some outside groups “helped” with the election:
The Groups – The groups listed below are just a few of the groups that took over the elections of the five largest Wisconsin cities. Every one of these groups are funded, ran, and staffed by progressive Democrat operatives that have highly partisan and extreme left-winged agendas. Every one of them. With months of research, we have yet to find one person working for one of these groups with conservative or Republican ties. Just because a group labels themselves “non-profit” or “non-partisan” doesn’t mean it’s true. These groups are all partisan left-wing operations.
Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) – This group was founded and is currently led by 2018 Obama Fellow Tiana Epps-Johnson. The group received the lion’s share of the $429.5 million that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg spent to sway the 2020 presidential election. Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein was in charge of CTCL’s Wisconsin effort. He also was part of the National Vote at Home Institute (NVAHI). Spitzer-Rubenstein served on the Obama campaign and travels in the highest Democrat circles. As stated above, he resides in Brooklyn.
The National Vote at Home Institute (NVAHI) – The founding CEO of this group is Amber McReynolds and her efforts in November of 2020 got her appointed to a lucrative seat on the US Postal Board by Joe Biden. Also, running the show for the Wisconsin effort was Hillary Hall, who I discussed above.
The Elections Group – Founded by Jennifer Morrell, who is an outspoken opponent of any effort to look into the November election. Her Wisconsin effort was led in part by Ryan Chew, who sent the extremely questionable late-night email to Claire Woodall-Vogg.
The Brennen Center - Elizabeth Howard is senior counsel for elections at the Brennen Center. She is the former Chief Financial Officer for the Tennessee Democrat Party. An email obtained from Claire Woodall-Vogg through open records requests shows that Ms. Howard held a zoom meeting with the elections administrators of Milwaukee (Claire), Austin, TX, Charlotte, NC, Detroit, MI, Lansing, MI, Columbus, OH, Cleveland, OH, Cincinnati, OH, Las Vegas, NV, and Chicago, IL. At some point we’d like to know why she had a zoom meeting with the election officials of all of these heavily democrat cities. All except Chicago were in states targeted by Zuckerberg operatives.
Fireside Campaigns – Campaigns? Why is there a campaigns group working with election officials? Their website states “we’re proud to have collaborated with Black Lives Matter and the DLCC (Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee)”. In fact, the website lists 48 of them, and not one Republican running for office or one conservative group are among their listed clients. The services they offer are “winning elections” - nothing more and nothing less. The website is very clear on that. We have again, obtained through open records, an email showing that Emily Slatkow from Fireside Campaigns had a “press call” with her and Claire Woodall-Vogg from Milwaukee and Claire’s counterparts in Fulton County, GA and Maricopa County, AZ. Included in on the call was Amber McReynolds from Vote at Home. This is incredible. These election officials are not the campaign coordinators for the Biden for America effort. These are the people who are supposed to be running fair and honest elections and they are clearly colluding with campaign operatives! Certainly, this demands answers and puts into question the integrity of our entire election process.
Power the Polls – Another “non-profit” that recruits poll workers also involved with Wisconsin’s elections. An email again obtained by open records requests show that Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein assisted the Wauwatosa clerk with staffing issues by directing her to Natalia Espina, who ran Wisconsin’s “Power the Polls” effort. If Natalia Espina sounds familiar, it’s because she was also the director of “Voces de la Frontera,” perhaps the most partisan left-wing group in the Milwaukee area.
The Voter Rolls
I had the opportunity to fly down to Phoenix and take a tour of the “forensic audit” that was taking place to see what all actually happened in Maricopa County during the 2020 election. The information gathered was fascinating to say the least. The Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections has heard expert testimony from various IT specialists, and they have pointed out many “inconsistencies” throughout Wisconsin’s voter rolls. A common theme throughout the IT community is that “bloated” voter rolls are the key to voter fraud. We already pointed out that WEC simply refused to remove dead, incompetent, and inactive voters from the voter rolls. Note: As of 2-14-2024 Wisconsin still has bloated voter rolls.
The MyVote Wisconsin website continues to be unsecure and once again WEC and our Republican leadership (Robin Vos) refuse to address it. Absentee ballots can be applied for online and there is no security whatsoever.
Military/Overseas Ballots – There is no registration needed to apply for a military ballot. It appears that anyone can go to the My Vote Wisconsin website and order a military ballot without providing any identification of any kind. It appears that nefarious actors could go to a busy place with Wi-Fi, access the MyVote website and send the ballots to a vacant house or apartment and there would be no way of identifying them. It’s very possible if not probable that no one would ever know. The numbers from the Wisconsin Election Integrity group are very concerning.
In 2016, there were a total of 1,513 "active/inactive" military designated voters on the My Vote WI voter roll.
In 2020, that number grew to 8,422.
In 2016, there were 766 military voters overseas from Wisconsin.
In 2020, that number grew to 5,720.
Military voters are exempt from registration.
I did not add these numbers to the spreadsheet below that lists questionable ballots. The numbers have not yet been vetted since this is an ongoing situation that is just now coming to light (11-1-22). For now, one has to view with a certain amount of skepticism that military ballots grew from 766 in 2016 to 5,720 from 2016 to 2020. UPDATE: The deputy elections clerk of the City of Milwaukee is on trial for sending Military ballots to State Rep., Janel Brandtjen who was then chair of the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.
The Electronic Registration Information Center (E.R.I.C.)
We now know the Electronic Registration Information Center (E.R.I.C.) was founded by George Soros along with the leftist David Becker who is Director of “The Center for election Innovation & Research” which of course sounds harmless, but the Berkeley graduate is as far left as they get. We last seen him as a guest on Sen. Bernier’s panel with Meagan Wolfe claiming that the 2020 election was “the safest and most secure in history.” The state of Wisconsin entered into a contract E.R.I.C. in 2015 to “maintain” the voter database, which obviously is not happening. The Chair of the Wisconsin Assembly Campaigns and Elections Committee is calling to end the relationship. The voter rolls remain bloated with deceased voters and people who moved away while access to the information is sketchy at best. The database can be (and probably is) manipulated by unseen and unknown operatives that are not held responsible by anyone. On September 8, 2022, Erick Kaardal, a lawyer from the Thomas More Society, testified in front of the Wisconsin Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections that the federal “Help America Votes Act” (HAVA) requires the states to maintain their own voter data and entering any agreement with outside entities is against the law.
The Machines:
We have all seen the flow chart from Mike Lindell and company showing votes going over to China and then coming back to the states having added “votes for Biden” that swung the election in the wee hours of the morning. That does seem far-fetched, and I’ll admit it is way above my pay grade. But certain things are worthy of much consideration. Information is coming in faster than I can document, verify, and report it.
1. Why are clerks, the election commission, the media, and of course the democrats ALL claiming that the machines are not hooked up to the internet when indeed they ARE hooked up to the internet. The machines have modems and if not hooked up directly to the internet they use telephone lines to communicate with the servers. The points where the data is transferred is where the data is most vulnerable, and that IS within my pay grade.
2. We can never get clear answers about who programs these machines. The answer is Dominion and ES&S (the two manufacturers of Wisconsin’s machines) do the programming in all the counties except Milwaukee and Dane. Milwaukee County told me that they program the machines together with the manufacturer, and Dane County said they program the machines themselves. Once again, the answers can be very misleading because clerks claim that they are programming the machines because they are plugging in the thumb-drive that the manufacturers send them, which of course means that the company is providing the program. The question is an important one because despite all the hype about how “each machine is tested” these machines can easily be manipulated to switch votes. A simple string of code that says after 250 ballots are processed a “specific candidate” cannot exceed say… 73.9% of the vote, which would make it hard for some of the outlying areas that may have a high turnout for a particular candidate to make up for a heavy turnout in say, Madison. How far-fetched is this? The clerks are less than cooperative, and the machine manufacturers are (across the country) reprogramming the machines before anyone can take a look.
3. The manufacturers have contracts that prohibit investigations into their equipment. Yes, you read that correctly. In addition, we cannot seem to find out who owns these companies and in which country the servers for these machines reside. In short, we still have more questions than answers.
The Numbers:
We know from above that at 3am central time, Ryan Chew sent Claire Woodall-Vogg an email congratulating her on “finding just enough ballots to get the job done” and it literally wasn’t long after that when Attorney General Josh Kaul, the entire press, along with the Democrat party declared the November 2020 election the “safest and most secure election ever” without looking into one email or even skimming through a few of the election complaints. As a matter of fact, the immediate push to declare any questioning of the election as a “conspiracy theory” is a desperate attempt to hide the fact that the election was indeed tainted. The extraordinary and universal effort by the left to declare any position on the election other than “safe and secure” as the “big lie” should tell you everything you need to know. We have identified well over 352,000 ballots that cannot be trusted to have been cast legally. No fair-minded observer could say that there isn’t enough evidence to declare the November 2020 election invalid.
Conclusion:
There’s a reason that the federal government has deemed anyone who questions the legitimacy of the 2020 a “threat to democracy.” Labeling people as an election denier is simply a desperate attempt to bully people into silence. It is an effective tool for many in today’s population; suddenly people get fired for tweeting things like “all lives matter’ or any other harmless statement that only a few years ago would be considered common sense. But the facts of the matter remain. The election was illegitimate, and we can’t allow ourselves to be intimidated to the point that we are afraid to acknowledge it.
Whether you agree that the call for decertification was appropriate or not, the evidence is overwhelming. For most of us it was never about Trump, it was about the question of right from wrong. The establishment including WISN, the Wisconsin GOP and Republican leadership has adopted the mantra that we are trying to “restore Trump to the White House” in order to draw attention away from the fact that they allowed the corruption of the 2020 election process to happen and therefor make anyone unhappy with the blatant level of dishonest activity look like (as Wisconsin Assembly Speaker calls us) “conspiracy theorists.” And much like the bogus January 6th commission, justice will be slow in coming if at all.
It is clear that the left, and many mindless Republicans insist that any election security is “voter suppression” and voting should be as easy as possible.
In Wisconsin, you can download an ID and request an absentee ballot. There’s two weeks of early voting, and we have same-day voter registration. How can it get easier than that?
For an in-depth look at the emails discussed above, please see my Substack 10#
Thank you Bill. A man from Door county at the spring district meeting for Green Bay area talked about fraud in Door county, the 2020 election, spring of 2021 or 2021. He talked about a trailer park with no one living there that had Voting from, a nursing home with more votes than residents and their average age being older than it was. FRAUD positively happened!!