Traditionally, scientific materialism and subjective materialism are considered part of the left. However, in recent years, the communist survivor nations have refused to follow political correctness and the gender liberation movement, aligning them somewhat with Christian liberals and traditional conservatives who, in the past, were considered right-wing compared to the materialists.
It is not incorrect for conservatives to label gender ideology as Marxist, because it is. However, it is not the scientific socialism but rather the well-preserved western Marxist tradition, sponsors of the first colored revolution, that they refer to. Since its inception, western Marxism in French and German schools had been infiltrated by the remnants of the Gestapo and state-sponsored actors, including NGOs. Many of them supported the proto-colored revolution coup d'état Charles de Gaulle Mai 1968.
Gender is assigned either at birth or as a social construct, which are posteriori concepts. Affirming social roles is dangerous because German fascists committed crimes based on roles assigned at birth and socially assigned roles. Gender assigned by society and other social roles assigned by others become dangerous tags and stereotypes. A recent tragedy in the “artistic recreation” of Western Marxist critique of gender completely abandoned class and had model Mexicans act like stereotypical Mexicans as a prerequisite condition for affirmative action, which is precisely why Western Marxists sought to avoid assigned gender in the first place: you have to be the perfect scapegoat to receive compensation for scapegoating. If you do not use LatinX and other tags and prescriptions invented by the authority, you aren’t the real identarian victim. Western Marxists believe that affirming social roles based on gender can dangerously echo historical instances where rigid gender roles and identities have been used to justify discrimination and persecution, especially under modern totalitarian states with 200 years of policing.
Gender affirmation care believes that human ideas and consciousness can transcend material determinism through transhuman augmentation, an ideology based on social science, poétry, and arts, not the biology of materialism. The human soul is distinct from the material body, believing in the afterlife and the immortality of the soul, suggesting that the human vessel designed by the baby-bearing person can be a misfit for the soul. If a Tibetan monk is reborn into a woman’s body, their superior soul can reforge their assigned gender at birth to their desire, whether through Tibetan Dark Arts or White Magic, or simple 22nd-century biochemistry, mystic arts with mind over body. And the misfitting body harms the soul, not whatever the body creates a landlocked neuron memory must tolerate the tingling torture of atmospheric pressure and boiling nitrogen. Changing hormones does not affect brain chemistry and character but makes them a better tool for the immortal soul. Yes, it’s artistic thinking and total witchcraft. It’s not The Ship of Theseus paradox; major hormone augmentation does not kill a personality, personality alteration is not material murder, at least that is what the Gender Euphoria ideologue believes, not what existentialism approves.
The new left is heavily dualistic, believing in witchcraft and an immortal Geist, which is the opposite of the materialistic left. At some point, we could see a Christian-Marxist alliance or MAGA Communist alliance because the new left’s ideology has departed so far from material reality and become dogmatic. Traditionalism and Christian liberals/libertarians are at least grounded in thousands of years of human progress that detachment from basic physics and production, a satanic or anti-human invention, will quickly drive the population or the ecosystem downhill and become easy prey for more humanist civilizations to conquer and force integration. Traditionalism at minimum guaranteed that everything they believe in is empirical knowledge beneficial to society, helping them survive since humans departed from Africa Eden Garden.
The New Left originates from Students for a Democratic Society, which was a movement with its own identity issues. The current cultural war is rather the final chapter of the cultural war since the 1960s when Christian Conservatives first allied with the U.S. Labor Party and proto-liberation theologians such as MLK, and they made alliances with the New Left they would regret in the 1980s, but it would be too late. The reformation of the Democratic Party to make it more labor-friendly was not a new concept either; the FDR alliance was out of necessity rather than true love. LaRouche and his followers, just like Bernie Sanders in 2016, tried to reform the Democratic party from the left and within. However, AOC and her culturally lefty “New Left” activists quickly sought amnesty for illegal immigrants like the Reagan Republicans and Koch Brothers. The new generation of radical labor leftists failed to draw the line and criticize the “New Left” in 2018, which was their undoing since they failed to recover the legacy of proto-liberation theologians and the LaRouche movement nor they learnt the catastrophic failures of the European Union before populist right wing parties became popular. Later in 2023, America saw “New Left” theologians focus on the liberation of one identity from the rest instead of old lessons from MLK, where poor whites and blacks are oppressed people together.
The American Labor would increasingly become the big Satan according to the “New Leftists” as the center of gravity for the labor movement naturally revolves around historical materialism. To some extent, the scientific dogma and the Christian dogma are equally dogmatic, since nothing can change the law of gravity nor the strong nuclear force; religion sometimes is empirical primitive scientific observation. Workers must obey the law of physics and worker safety protocol, or death in the thousands would soon come. In the past, we observed tragedy in the tens of thousands simply because workers failed to follow production safety protocols. This hard science cannot be denied and is the furthest point away from New Left witchcraft, which believes that good morality is more important than material well-being. Secular positive laws are more important than natural laws and the primitive happiness response one mother touches her children. Ethics, not physics, is the first line politicians draw according to the “New Left.”
The Classic struggle between Art and Science, Poesies and Mimesis is not a real debate in America. Everywhere you go, the world is dominated by entertainment, and anything metaphysical and imitative would not get big algorithm’s recommendation. Congress members infamously taunt that everything promoted on TikTok in America involves stupid stunts, while in China, you see scientific experiments and mathematics problem-solving. He forgot to turn off his YouTube search history, so TikTok simply bought his view history and copy-pasted the most likely attention-grabbing formula. Neither Reality nor Science matters in American political debates; experimental policies are taken at face value, and the theoretical social impact is taken as empirical data. This is both anti-science and extremely radical progressive, while the scientific materialists hate the anti-intellectualism and the traditionalists hate this mass social experiments with no rollback option.
The New Left promoted a conservative vision of Corporate Socialism, commonly known as Socialism for the Rich, Communism with Wall Street as the Politburo and Gosplan, continuing the long tradition of money in politics since the first “Pope sponsored by the Florence bankers and the House of Medici.” For conservatives, they hate the socialism part, and for the traditional left, they hate the corporatism-fascism most.
The stars have aligned once again for a new unholy alliance between civil rights partners to form the “New Conservative” (civil rights front and economical liberation, war on poverty and disease, or simply labeled as conservative by the “New Left”) against the “New Left” in power since the Obama presidency. In popular language, the “New Left” is the daemon that came from the First World or the Warp (Pathfinder/Warhammer), living in a super-real metaphysical reality, where their lingering dream dominated them to perform the reconstruction and reorganization of our reality. Yes, Alex Jones was right again. This is the Kant-Aristotle experience of a brain in a jar, the brain meditates trying to realize the fading memory of the “real world” or the First World. Our sole material world is a playground for them; everything is less real and less ideal, they need to alter their host’s body for a more entertaining experience. We are mere Non-Playable Characters providing basic interactive functions for the believers of the “New Left.” For them, iPhones and cars grow from trees, since their bourgeoisie culture isolates them from production in rural and overseas factories. They think they are the Promethean vanguards, handing out hallucinogens to materialists and traditionalists, to open their eyes and re-see the First World, the perfect world where gods reside like how Prometheus steals the fire. For the “New Right” alliance, they are the Sandman, petite bourgeoisie who derive their sustenance from bond coupons inherited from the last war, trying to spread decadence and anti-intellectualism.
Lyndon LaRouche
Lyndon LaRouche's perspective might view the article's portrayal of gender ideology's shift from classical Marxism to a Western Marxist framework as reflective of his critique of postmodern and "Western Marxist" theories. He could contend that the emphasis on identity politics, including the complexities of gender identity, diverts attention from the paramount concerns of economic justice and scientific advancement that are central to his advocacy. LaRouche might interpret this shift as a diversion from the fundamental class struggle and the economic transformations necessary for fostering a more just society. He posited that Western Marxists serve as a controlled opposition, designed to undermine classical Marxist principles by diverting their focus, essentially placing them in a position to diminish the influence of classical Marxism. By fertilizing the specie on the same food chain hierarchy in an ecosystem, effectively starve out the similar alternative.
LaRouche's philosophy placed a strong emphasis on scientific materialism as the lens through which to understand economic and societal dynamics. Thus, he might critique the New Left's pivot away from materialism towards more dualistic beliefs, such as the notion that the human soul can transcend material circumstances through gender affirmation care, labeling it as an escape from the tangible material conditions that shape human life and societal advancement. This departure from scientific realism by the New Left could be seen by LaRouche as misaligned with his own convictions on the necessity of scientific and technological progress for economic growth.
LaRouche might find points of agreement with the article's critique of the New Left's detachment from scientific realism, aligning with his emphasis on the role of scientific development and technological innovation in driving economic progress. He would likely advocate for a comprehensive reform of the economic system, as per his proposals, including the enactment of his Four Laws for economic recovery. These laws advocate for directing credit towards productive investments, reinstating a Glass-Steagall type of separation between commercial and investment banking, establishing a national banking system to support infrastructure and development projects, and initiating an ambitious program for space exploration and fusion energy research.
Examples:
1. The Soma Mine Disaster (2014) - In Turkey, an explosion and fire in a coal mine resulted in the deaths of 301 miners. Investigations found that safety inspections had been inadequate, and there was a failure to follow existing safety protocols, contributing to the scale of the tragedy.
2. The Rana Plaza Collapse (2013) - In Bangladesh, the collapse of the Rana Plaza building, which housed several garment factories, killed over 1,100 people and injured more than 2,500. The tragedy was attributed to ignoring safety warnings, the illegal addition of extra floors, and the failure to adhere to building and safety codes.
3. The Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1984) - In Bhopal, India, a leak of methyl isocyanate gas from a pesticide plant exposed over half a million people to toxic gas. The disaster, one of the world's worst industrial catastrophes, resulted in thousands of deaths and continued health issues for many survivors. Inadequate safety protocols and maintenance failures were significant contributors to the incident.
Reading List:
1. "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters" by Frances Stonor Saunders - Saunders' book provides insight into how cultural and ideological battles were part of the larger Cold War context, influencing and intersecting with movements like the New Left.
https://amzn.to/3SAXmRB
2. "The Long Sixties: From 1960 to Barack Obama" by Tom Hayden - Hayden, a key figure in the New Left, provides a firsthand account of the movement's evolution and its long-term effects on American politics, including the shifts within the Democratic Party.
https://amzn.to/3OHhrVb
3. "Stayin’ Alive: The 1970s and the Last Days of the Working Class" by Jefferson Cowie - Cowie's narrative links the decline of the American working class with the political and cultural transformations of the 1970s, offering insights into the shifting alliances and conflicts between labor and leftist movements.
https://amzn.to/3SVumV5