SIDS

“78.3 % occurred within 7 days post-vaccination”

Oct 31, 2022

The year is 2014, and I’m busy running a business that’s about to be sold. My sister had gone through an ugly divorce a few years earlier, but I’d stayed in touch with her ex-husband, my ex-brother-in-law, a good guy that also did some web marketing work for us. He had remarried and now had a 6-month little boy at home.

I’m sitting at my desk at work, when the phone rings. It’s a colleague of my ex-brother-in-law calling to tell me that he will be out of action for a while, as his baby had died.

I sat there, at my desk, crying.

I discovered later that the baby room was treated as a crime scene, standard protocol to assume the parents might have killed their baby. The injecting doctor was never a suspect.

I knew of SIDS but had never come so close to it. In truth my entire journey as a parent was coloured by the terror that it could happen to us.

I was asleep in 2014, it never occurred to me for 1 second that it might have anything to do with vaccination. But thanks to the GMC, that is no longer the case.

I find the video above unique in so many ways. She has been woken up after almost 40 years of suffering to realise what had happened to her baby boy, Aaron. In her words:

“…and it dawned on me, that I poisoned my kid.”

Whoever thought that reusing “Sudden” to explain all the adult sudden deaths “SADS” has done the world a magnificent service. The word that put us all to sleep, is also the word that awakened Aaron’s mother, and I think millions of others.

It’s THEIR hubris. It worked once, surely it will work again…

This short video on SADS is worth watching.

A 30 year recent analysis of VAERS infant death data, concluded with this:

This study found that a substantial proportion of infant deaths and SIDS cases occurred in temporal proximity to vaccine administration. The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001). Several theories regarding the pathogenic mechanism behind these fatal events have been proposed, including the role of vaccine-induced inflammatory cytokines as neuromodulators in the infant medulla preceding an abnormal response to the accumulation of carbon dioxide; fatal disorganization of respiratory control induced by adjuvants that cross the blood-brain barrier; and biochemical or synergistic toxicity due to multiple vaccines administered concurrently.
There are 130 official ways for an infant to die, as categorized in the ICD, and one unofficial way for an infant to expire: from a fatal reaction to vaccines. When vaccine-related deaths are hidden within the death tables, it is difficult to monitor and prevent these deaths. In addition, parents are denied the ability to ascertain honest vaccine risk-to-benefit ratios and true informed consent to vaccination is not possible. This is why increased effort and transparency toward achieving an accurate account of vaccine-related infant mortality is a desirable goal.

The Abstract puts it this way:

Although there is considerable evidence that a subset of infants has an increased risk of sudden death after receiving vaccines, health authorities eliminated "prophylactic vaccination" as an official cause of death, so medical examiners are compelled to misclassify and conceal vaccine-related fatalities under alternate cause-of-death classifications. In this paper, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database was analyzed to ascertain the onset interval of infant deaths post-vaccination.
Of 2605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 through 2019, 58 % clustered within 3 days post-vaccination and 78.3 % occurred within 7 days post-vaccination, confirming that infant deaths tend to occur in temporal proximity to vaccine administration.

This 78.3% within 7 days is very, very, very significant. Here is how to understand the absolutely non-random nature of that number.

Each day is 0.27% of the year (1/365).

Meaning that 7 days is 1.9% of the year (7/365).

If vaccination had nothing to do with SIDS, then what you would find is that 1.9% of SIDS deaths occurred within 7 days of vaccination.

But 78.3% is not 1.9%, is it?

You can prove causation with stats. They don’t like doing it, but this is what hard evidence looks like. If deaths bunch up around a direct intervention, that intervention is causing the deaths. The biological mechanism of action simply tells us how the murder was done, not whether the murderer is guilty or not.

I want to dwell on this 30-year study for a while. It’s an excellent review of the history of SIDS data, data manipulation and medical malfeasance. The study is a must read for anyone with a baby that is being jibby jabbed left right and centre, and it’s also a must read for anyone curious enough to want to know the history of this evil.

They have been lying to us about vaccines killing babies from the start. It goes back to the 60s.

Prior to the introduction of organized vaccination programs, "crib death" was so rare that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. In the United States, national immunization campaigns were expanded in the 1960s when several new vaccines were introduced and promoted. For the first time in history, most U.S. infants were required to receive several doses of DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus), polio, and measles vaccines. (The measles vaccine was administered at 9 months of age from 1963 to 1965). Mumps and rubella vaccines were also introduced in the 1960s. By 1969, an alarming epidemic of sudden unexplained infant deaths impelled researchers to create a new medical term—sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). By 1972, SIDS had become the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality (infant deaths occurring between 28 days and 1 year of life) in the United States. In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics, operated by the CDC, created a new cause-of-death category to document deaths due to SIDS.

Lying with labels

One of the oldest tricks in the books of these liars has been playing games with labels and categories. It’s very effective and often the backbone of statistical manipulation.

The official causes of death listed in the ICD include nearly every imaginable—and tragic—possibility. In fact, previous versions of the ICD listed "prophylactic inoculation and vaccination" as a separate cause-of-death category, with subcategories for deaths caused by specific vaccines. However, when the ICD was revised in 1979—and in subsequent updates to the ICD—all cause-of-death classifications associated with vaccination were eliminated. Since then, medical certifiers have been unable to list vaccination as an official cause of death because the ICD no longer contains a code for that possibility. This is odd because health authorities are aware that some children will become permanently disabled or die after receiving vaccines—the very reason Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660), which created the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
---
"SIDS," "suffocation in bed," and death due to "unknown and unspecified causes," are just three of the 130 official cause-of-death categories that might be concealing fatalities that were actually due to vaccination. Several other ICD categories are possible candidates for incorrect infant death classifications: unspecified viral diseases, diseases of the blood, diseases of the nervous system, unspecified diseases of the respiratory system, cardiac arrest, and shaken baby syndrome. All of these official categories may be repositories of vaccine-related infant deaths reclassified as common fatalities.

So, before 1979 you could classify a baby’s death as vaccine related using an ICD (International Classification of Diseases) but after 1979, you couldn’t. You have to call it, and link it to something else, including to “Sudden” which seems to be the medical liar’s way of simply “Shrugging” and claiming, with a straight face, “we have absolutely no idea what killed your baby, it’s a complete mystery.”

Which is weird, because on the other end, they pay out claims for death and disability from vaccines. So no ICD code at one end, but billions of dollars at the other…what a mystery.

As of May 1, 2021, more than $4.5 billion was granted for thousands of injuries and deaths associated with vaccines.

Blaming parents

Another trick the liars use is blaming anyone else. We’ve seen lawyers use that trick in movies when they want to redirect suspicion to anyone else but their client…”it was the gardener that killed my client’s wife!”

That “anyone else” is very often the parents. In the SIDS story, the “Back to Sleep” campaign was definitely a suspicion shifting exercise. “if only the parents would make sure their babies slept on their backs, then we wouldn’t have all these babies dying!”.

In 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) came up with a plan to reduce the unacceptable SIDS rate while reassuring concerned mothers and fathers that sudden unexplained infant deaths were not related to vaccines. The AAP initiated a national "Back to Sleep" campaign, telling parents to place their infants supine, rather than prone, during sleep. From 1992 through 2001, post-neonatal SIDS declined by an average annual rate of 8.6 %. It seemed as though the "Back to Sleep" campaign was successful and that the real cause of SIDS was due not to vaccinations but from babies sleeping on their bellies.
However, a closer inspection of the ICD—the 130 official ways for an infant to die—revealed a loophole. Medical certifiers, such as coroners, could choose from among several categories of death when a baby suddenly expired. They didn’t have to list the death as SIDS. Although the post-neonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6 % from 1992 through 2001 following the AAP’s seemingly successful "Back to Sleep" campaign, the post-neonatal mortality rate from "suffocation in bed" (ICD-9 code E913.0) increased during this same period at an average annual rate of 11.2 %. Sudden, unexplained infant deaths that were classified as SIDS prior to the "Back to Sleep" campaign were now being classified as deaths due to suffocation in bed.
--
In Australia, a similar subterfuge seemed to occur. Researchers observed that when the SIDS rate decreased, deaths attributed to asphyxia increased.
--
The trend toward reclassifying sudden infant deaths under alternate ICD codes is an ongoing concern. From 1999 through 2015, the U.S. SIDS rate declined 35.8 % while infant deaths due to accidental suffocation increased 183.8 %.

So, both tricks used at the same time, blame the parents, then by playing games with the codes “prove” that the campaign worked, and it was the parents all along.

When you start asking the question “What else have they lied to me about?” and you go looking, the answer turns out to be “almost everything”, with “almost” being the most generous of qualifiers, I’m not even sure why I’m using it.

An Australian Story

For obvious reasons I’m particularly interested in Australian stories.

In the 1960s and 1970s, Aborigine infants began to mysteriously die at alarming rates. In some regions of Australia, 1 of every 2 babies succumbed to an unexplained death. Archie Kalokerinos, an Australian physician, solved the riddle when he realized the deaths were occurring shortly after the babies were vaccinated. Health officials had recently initiated a mass vaccination campaign to protect Aborigine babies; their deaths corresponded with the vaccination program. Kalokerinos realized that these babies were severely malnourished. Their undeveloped immune systems couldn’t handle the additional stress of vaccination: "Some would die within hours from acute vitamin C deficiency precipitated by the immunization. Others would suffer immunological insults and die later from pneumonia, gastroenteritis, or malnutrition." Kalokerinos was able to save numerous babies from the same fate by administering small quantities of vitamin C (100 mg per month of age) prior to their vaccines.
Linus Pauling, who won a Nobel Prize in chemistry, supported the work of Kalokerinos.

That is an astronomical death rate, and I’m sure covered up by our government medical liars. The Vit C thread is very interesting to me, as Vit C (and Linus Pauling) is a recent discovery for me and something I’ll write about soon.

Japan and the value of delaying

The Japanese have proven that simply delaying these shots decreases infant mortality dramatically. The industrial medical “system” cannot even bring itself to delay the shots, even that smallest of concessions would be an admission of the dangers of their poisons.

In Japan, from 1970 through 1974, there were 37 documented sudden infant deaths following pertussis vaccinations, inciting parents and doctors to reject the shot. In 1975, Japanese authorities reacted to these events by raising the age of vaccination from 3 months to 2 years. As a result, the number of vaccine injury compensation claims that were paid out for sudden deaths following vaccination dropped from 37 cases during a 5-year period to just 3 cases during the next 6-and-a-half years (from 1975 through August of 1981). The sudden death rate following vaccination dropped from 1.47 to 0.15 deaths per million doses—a 90 % improvement. In addition, from the early 1970s (a period when 3-month-old infants were vaccinated) to the mid-1980s (ten years after the age of vaccination was raised to 2 years) the Japanese infant mortality rate (infant deaths per 1000 live births) declined from 12.4–5.0—a 60 % improvement. A special Task Force on Pertussis and Pertussis Immunization investigated the Japanese data and published their report in the journal Pediatrics. According to Cherry et al. "The category ’sudden death’ is instructive in that it disappeared following both whole-cell and acellular vaccines when immunization was delayed until a child was 24 months of age." The special Task Force also made the following observation: "It is clear that delaying the initial vaccination until a child is 24 months, regardless of the type of vaccine, reduces most of the temporally associated severe adverse reactions."

Hot lots: A Tennessee story

In 1978–1979, 11 babies in Tennessee died within 8 days following DPT vaccination. Five of the babies died suddenly within 24 h of vaccination. Nine of the 11 babies had received their vaccine from the same lot. A subsequent investigation confirmed a greater than expected relationship between Lot #64201 of the DPT vaccine and SIDS. Initially, health authorities "did not feel that a causal relationship could be totally excluded." Later, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a revised statement that "experts…did not find evidence of a cause-effect relationship." Finally, the CDC claimed that the SIDS cases in Tennessee that occurred shortly after DPT vaccination were all a "coincidence." (After this incident, internal memos by the vaccine manufacturer revealed a new policy of limiting shipments of DPT vaccine so that no geographical location would receive all of the product from a single lot, confounding the ability to trace hot lots that might cause clusters of SIDS cases post-vaccination.)

So, said another way, they decided to spread the death around so that it wouldn’t show up in specific geographical locations, and make it almost impossible to detect a pattern.

I just want to say this again, for the thousandths time. These are the people that brought you Covid jabs. It’s the same people, the same personality types, the same incentives, the same system…it’s just MUCH MUCH bigger and badder today.

This from A Midwestern Doctor:

The whole cell pertussis vaccine (given in combination with tetanus and diptheria) developed through these programs was problematic. Physicians at the time observed that sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) did not exist prior to introduction of the vaccine, and infant death always happened in correlation with vaccination. I have seen a variety of different resources on exact timing of SIDS, but most references state that 90% of SIDS occurs between 2-4 months of age, and the 3 doses of the DTP vaccine are typically given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age.
The evidence that most strongly supports this hypothesis came from the initial COVID lockdowns. Many people in the conventional medical community predicted that infants not coming in for their well child (vaccine) visits would be severely harmed. In contrast, individuals in the vaccine safety movement predicted before the data was even available that this was a once in a lifetime opportunity to see a reduction in SIDS. A reduction in SIDS did occur, alongside an unprecedented decline in premature births (which are also linked to vaccination).
In addition to SIDS, the DTP vaccine was known for causing brain damage, and to some extent is correlated with increasing crime and ADHD rates (both of which are often reflective of brain damage). The brain damage issue was quite common (two children within my extended family for example experienced these complications) and a torrent of lawsuits were filed against the manufacturer in the 1980s. Since the legal cost of these lawsuits exceeded the revenue from vaccination, that litigation situation served as the basis for the creation of National Vaccine Injury Program.

This comment from one of my readers.

KC & the sunshine
I said NO to the hard-sell they were giving me to get my 7 & 11 yr old girls the HPV gardisil vax. Thank GOD for the tingling of my spidey-sense ! They’d have gotten HPV gardisil 1. It’s even worse than gardisil 9, which is what’s currently given. Both have rendered girls as young as 12 “safely & effectively” into extremely early menopause and infertility.
Then a friend’s wonderfully precocious toddler got a bunch of catch-up vax after having been out of the country a few months. On the way to the appt., their video shows her clapping and singing, being a regular Shirley Temple. Within hours after the appt., she stopped eating, smiling, clapping, singing, making eye contact, couldn’t poop, harmed herself by bashing her head on her crib, never again made eye contact, never cuddled, barely slept 3 hours a night, rushed to ER 3-4 times, was mainly “hand waved” regarding whether hers was a vax injury. A kindly, wise nurse pulled them aside and declared it an absolute vax injury. The darling little girl died 3 weeks later, having basically screamed herself to death with the “DTaP Scream” for the final weeks of her little life.
I don’t know how the vax program has been perpetuated all this time. I DO know that nations which have cut down on childhood vax have seen less SIDS, fewer cases of autism and better health in general of their children. The US spends far more per capita than anyone yet our health, even the babies and toddlers, is worse than many far poorer nations.
HOW do they get away with it???

---

This was posted on FB a while back; glad I saved it as the account is now gone. Someone took a detailed look at SIDS timeframes in Australia.

The TGA hide ‘timeframe' info on reports of death and other serious reports from the public because the info is damning and it incriminates them!

What I bring to your attention this morning is some info on the timeframes between shots and serious adverse reactions and reports of death...This post does not directly relate to the covid shots, as that timeframe info remains completely hidden from the public...Following on from a report of death in a baby that I shared yesterday involving the Infanrix HEXA shot, a 2019 FOI into hidden reports against Infanrix HEXA contains some info on timeframes between shots and serious reports and deaths...

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-1345-01.pdf

I need to quickly explain the context of this and similar FOIs...The TGA has two databases for 'managing' suspected adverse reaction reports – the AEMS which is an internal database, and the DAEN which is the public database...ALL suspected adverse reaction reports received by the TGA are added to the AEMS...From there the TGA ‘decides’ which reports it will add to the DAEN and which reports it will hide from the public by NOT including them on the DAEN...I will include in comments an old post of mine that explains this in more detail and provides links to many FOIs of serious reports of harm and reports of death against vaccines...To be clear, all of the FOIs in the post in comments contain the reports the TGA decided NOT to share with the public, and that’s why they were FOIed! These FOIs also contain some detail on timeframes between shots and harm or death...

The following are reports of death against Infanrix HEXA that the TGA hid from the public by NOT including them on the DAEN...This shot is recommended at 2, 4 and 6 months of age...All of the following reports of death involve babies...There are other reports of death in babies in the FOI document, but I have only included those that detail a timeframe in the report...The timeframe info is located in the section that details the shots administered...

Reports of death in babies against Infanrix HEXA that the TGA hid from the public...

268163 M <1 SIDS - THE SAME DAY

289653 M <1 Death - 6 DAYS LATER

293792 M <1 SIDS - 3 DAYS LATER

349290 F <1 SIDS - 3 DAYS LATER

349811 F <1 Death - 3 DAYS LATER

354087 F <1 Death - 7 DAYS LATER

360102 M <1 Death - THE SAME DAY

360752 M <1 Death - THE NEXT DAY

366847 M <1 Death – THE NEXT DAY

370842 M <1 Death - THE NEXT DAY

371681 F <1 SIDS - THE NEXT DAY

385852 F <1 Death neonatal - 4 DAYS LATER

404128 F <1 SIDS - 5 DAYS LATER

422821 M <1 Sudden death – THE SAME DAY

423141 M <1 SIDS - THE NEXT DAY

423177 M <1 Sudden death – THE SAME DAY

438423 M <1 SIDS - 6 DAYS LATER

463814 M <1 Death - THE NEXT DAY

464393 M <1 SIDS - THE SAME DAY

To further demonstrate my point that the TGA hide damning info from the public, the Infanrix HEXA FOI document contains lots of reports of ‘Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode’ which is a pretty serious adverse reaction...There are other reports of Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode in the FOI document, but I will just list below the reports that contain timeframe information...

243272 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

245032 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

245056 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

248319 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

261083 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

261388 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

273400 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

279198 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

280218 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE NEXT DAY

283063 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

294731 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

297318 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

304714 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

307024 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

307114 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE NEXT DAY

317456 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

328330 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

340889 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

342782 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

345449 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

347970 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

348800 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

360625 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE NEXT DAY

371457 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

395273 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

405859 M <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

407769 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

476165 F <1 Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode – THE SAME DAY

A possible safety signal!

And now you know why the TGA dont make timeframe info available to the public on serious adverse reaction reports and reports of death, unless forced to via FOIs...Other regulators overseas, including the US, do make timeframe info available in post market safety surveillance data, but not our ever transparent TGA...

I am in no doubt whatsoever that the timeframe info on the nearly 900 reports of death against the covid shots would be shocking, and that’s why its hidden!

Lies are Unbekoming